Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If the chiefs give up 18 points to the broncos tonight...


Jase

Recommended Posts

They give up 18 or more we allow less ppg

 

I'm no math major but through 9 games KC has allowed 111 points. (12.33 ppg).  Through 9 games we have allowed 115 points (12.77 ppg).  Hypothetically speaking if we shut out New England then through 10 games we would have allowed 115 points (11.5 ppg).  If KC gave up 5 points against Denver then they would have allowed 116 points (11.6 ppg).  So I'm wondering why the magic number of 18?  Am I missing something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's actually 17.  17 points means KC will have allowed 128 points through 10 games (12.8 ppg) vs our 12.77 PPG.  It's only valid until we play our game tomorrow.  Like I said, we'll likely have the top scoring defense for only a day.

 

We're talking PPG, not total points allowed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm no math major but through 9 games KC has allowed 111 points. (12.33 ppg).  Through 9 games we have allowed 115 points (12.77 ppg).  Hypothetically speaking if we shut out New England then through 10 games we would have allowed 115 points (11.5 ppg).  If KC gave up 5 points against Denver then they would have allowed 116 points (11.6 ppg).  So I'm wondering why the magic number of 18?  Am I missing something?

 

Yes, you are. If KC gives up exactly 17 they will have allowed 12.8 ppg, Panthers have allowed 12.77 ppg in games actually played.  So, Panters #1 until their game Monday.

 

Based on score with 5 minutes left, KC has allowed 13.8 points per game. For Carolina to remain #1, they would have to give up less than 23 points to the Patriots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Malcom Spence is the best player remaining, hope he’s there.
    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
×
×
  • Create New...