Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Women With Big Butts Are Smarter


Jangler

Recommended Posts

http://pocho.com/study-women-with-big-butts-are-the-smartest/

 

video in the link...

 

 

 

“Marie Curie, for example, had to back that ass up in the lab all the time — and look how brilliant she was!” remarked butt researcher Benedict Pollen. “This supports the long-rumored story that Albert Einstein himself wore baggy clothing to try to mask the fact that he had it going on.”

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWzlnYpLlgI

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tumblr_kpowqoR2Wn1qzma4ho1_400.jpg

 

 

assuming we're defining big butts as overweight, western social standards of beauty mean that overweight women are not as biologically fit (the scientific term for guys wanting to bang them) as their slimmer counterparts. in formative years educationally  (mandated schooling as well as university) given the way social cliques work in symbiosis with social standards of attractiveness, i think you could posit that to a degree - a small one at least - attractive people tend to do more social things (which leaves less time for doing intellectual things) whereas "unattractive" people may spend less time socializing with peers (allowing more time for intellectual pursuits.)

 

i worry this comes across as a "fatty fatty no friends" chant when reality dictates that an innumerable amount of variables are at play in something like this that make a concrete-encased uniformity or a law-like generalization impossible to adequately propose. however i think there's a case to be made that in some cases, for some people, it serves as an explanation.

 

other possible factors:

 

1) smart people are more self-confident people and therefore are more comfortable with not adapting to arbitrary social standards of beauty

 

2) if someone's intelligence correlates directly to their profession, the way they spend their time may have an effect on physical condition. a brilliant astrophysicist spending 70 hours a week in a lab may simply not have the time to hit the gym, whereas a waitress of average intelligence may have extra time to pursue that physical standard.

 

etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
    • Well, seeing as we play the Lions at home this year, pretty sure that rumor isn't true.
×
×
  • Create New...