Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

OK who seriously was worried we were gonna lose?


xclr82xtc

Did you have some mojo??  

74 members have voted

  1. 1. DID you honestly think the panthers were going to...

    • WIN!!! (i never doubted them even down)
      27
    • LOSE!!! (i honestly thought the trap game was for real and we take the L)
      45
    • I dont know enough about the team to know one way or the other.
      2


Recommended Posts

The place where i watch the game has steadily been increasing in panthers fans over the last few weeks.. and at half time, all i Kept hearing was,  "oh here we go again"  and "see panthers really aint that good"  and this is people that are supposed to be carolina fans!!   The whole time im just sitting there grinning, and another "panther fan" commences to betting me that carolina loses.... well i went home with a free meal and 100 bucks in my pocket..

 

 

so who out there really thought we were gonna lose this game at half time, and who was never worried??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol fug that panther fan who bet you they would lose. They sound like one of the negative trolls on this forum. Anyway my opinion was that I never doubted we could win but I was just waiting for the offense to finally wake up. I would for sure never bet that the panthers would lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That first half was just plain ugly. Every facet of the game looked abysmal. Fans had plenty of reason to be concerned. Would I ever bet against my team? No. Did that last second field goal give me fresh hope and optimism? Yes. But let's not pretend it was all sunshine and daisies and that anybody who lost some confidence after such an abysmal showing is somehow not a fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That first half was just plain ugly. Every facet of the game looked abysmal. Fans had plenty of reason to be concerned. Would I ever bet against my team? No. Did that last second field goal give me fresh hope and optimism? Yes. But let's not pretend it was all sunshine and daisies and that anybody who lost some confidence after such an abysmal showing is somehow not a fan.

 

I think he's talking about the panthers fan who bet against the team to lose. But yeah I agree, people shouldn't be judge as not being a fan for having doubts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...