Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do we have a balanced offense?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

I think that the past 3 weeks has made the offense appear to be less balanced. But good defenses do that, they make you pick your poison. New England sold out to take away the run game and made Cam beat them with his arm, while Miami and San Fran both have fantastic front sevens to defend the run and we had to take what we could get in the passing game and short yardage run game.

 

Call me crazy, but I would like to see Cam get more yardage in the air. We have been running all year, you would think that the play action game is prime to be revved up about now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep in mind that Rivera's idea of "balanced" was never about equal percentages of run and pass.

 

Rivera wanted an offense that was equally dangerous using both run and pass so that is a team took one away, we could burn them with the other.

 

Do we now fit that definition?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teams have figured out that we don't have a legit deep threat and they're stacking the hell out of the box to focus on shutting down our running game because they're not worried about getting beat deep.  But, our D keeps us in the game and Cam has been money in the clutch during this winning streak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teams have figured out that we don't have a legit deep threat and they're stacking the hell out of the box to focus on shutting down our running game because they're not worried about getting beat deep.  But, our D keeps us in the game and Cam has been money in the clutch during this winning streak.

 

Neither Smitty nor Ginn is a legitimate deep threat?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

aren't we the 4th best rushing team?

 

IMO balanced doesn't mean you necessarily do both things equally statistically, but when necessary one facet of your team can make up for a deficit in the other. and this team has shown the ability to chuck the rock when things aren't going so well on the ground, or grind it out on the ground when the passing game is lacking.

 

we could always be better, but i'd say we're balanced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

aren't we the 4th best rushing team?

 

IMO balanced doesn't mean you necessarily do both things equally statistically, but when necessary one facet of your team can make up for a deficit in the other. and this team has shown the ability to chuck the rock when things aren't going so well on the ground, or grind it out on the ground when the passing game is lacking.

 

we could always be better, but i'd say we're balanced.

 

If you look back across our wins, are there games you would say we've won primarily on one or the other?

 

If so, how many of each?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...