Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Jets Irony


AceBoogie

Recommended Posts

The jets ironically give up more through the air than they do the ground with a #2 rush defense. Their air defense is ranked a lowly 24th. What should be the game plan offensively?

Do we stubbornly try to grind it out on the ground? Or do we speed up the tempo to negate their dline and test out their secondary?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It isn't as if we haven't been balanced to this point, but a game where we get the passing game in sync could be used.

 

 

We tried last night for the first time in a while to pretty consistently take deep shots down the field and we just didn't have the personnel playing at the level they needed to be for it. With Byron bell unable to even stand in the way of his man and our receivers not doing much to get open, along with occasion Cam blunder when those two other facets do finally pan out (seldom) we really don't have the ability to drive down the field as much as we have in years gone by.

 

a game where we can get into a rhythm doing so would do well for this team-but the jets front 7 is nothing to squawk at

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A good rush defense against standard rushing attack is one thing but how are they against scrambling QBs? I think Cam will be able to get the rushing game going with his legs if we struggle with our RBs...and of course that'll open up things against their pass defense. But as mentioned above, we have to control the clock and get into a rhythm offensively so the defense will have to do its job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a tough game. We need to run the ball to keep them honest. I wouldn't count on Cam running wild on a Rex Ryan D. That Cam scrambling stuff works against less athletic lines. I'm not sure who is healthy for the Jets but they are talented enough to catch him. I would favor the pass but you can't become one dimensional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The same Jets that beat the team we were just blown out by. Not to mention the lesser Ryan shut down our offense. We got his brother this week

And I am sure the Ryan brothers will have a good and long talk this week over the phone, if ya know what I mean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I am sure the Ryan brothers will have a good and long talk this week over the phone, if ya know what I mean.

Your right didn't think about that. This game will come down to if we get bad Geno or good Geno. If even average Geno shows up we could be in trouble if we aren't putting up points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I read that Pittsburgh is a possibility.  I think of college QB studs who had some form of mental quirk yet tons of talent--but their issue made being a team leader difficult and it led to their demise--going back:  Jamarcus Russell, Art Schlichter, Jeff George, etc. I think people forget that the QB must not only have talent, but they must lead.  
    • I wish I knew more details, but the NIL money to 20-year olds combined with easy access to gambling sites is a side effect that these kids may not have considered.  To your point,A famous 2009 Sports Illustrated article titled “How (and Why) Athletes Go Broke” estimated that 78% of retired NFL players go bankrupt or face significant financial stress within two years of leaving the league.  I am guessing that ego and $$$ and the thrill of competition (most pro athletes love competition because they are the winners) makes it a powerful temptation.  Throw in the ease of gambling on your phone which is always in your hand, and I see your point x 10.
    • Freeling got some reps at RT when they gave Moton a rest day--I sorta hope Freeling gets brought along slowly as you describe.  It would be better for him for reasons you provide.  We have a really good problem. 
×
×
  • Create New...