Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brandon Lafell - Sign, Tender, or Waive Goodbye


Zod

Brandon Lafell  

152 members have voted

  1. 1. Brandon Lafell - Sign, Negotiate for Cheap, Waive Goodbye?

    • Sign Now - we need him
      9
    • Tender - maybe someone else needs him
      66
    • Buh Bye
      77


Recommended Posts

I've always been big on Brandon LaFell, from his rookie year (when I thought he was better and had more potential than David Gettis, which turned out to be true) to now (when I view him as a solid #3 receiver and a great blocker), so I'd love to see him come back for a reasonable price. That said, he hasn't nearly progressed to be anything close to a #2 receiver and he's proven to be very inconsistent as a starter. So, I think we have a few scenarios: 

*If we can re-sign Tedd Ginn to a long-term deal and bring in Hakeem Nicks or another legitimate receiver, I'd be fine with letting him walk. Ginn is much more useful as a #3 guy than Brandon LaFell would be and it makes no sense to carry a guy as the #4 when we have guys with good potential like Marvin McNutt and Tavarres King.
*If we can re-sign Ginn to a long-term deal but cannot sign another wide receiver, we need to consider signing him to a short-term, 1 or 2 year deal.
*If we cannot sign Ginn at all and he walks, we must bring back Brandon LaFell for the next few seasons.

Overall, it just depends on what happens in free agency. LaFell is a decent player, but is expendable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See you later Lafell.  Would rather have Hixon and give the young guys a shot.  I have a buddy who graduated from Georgia and attends all Georgia games.  Said Tavarres King is a great wide receiver and surprised he is not on our active roster.  Draft a WR early in the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with previous posters - isn't he a UFA since this was his 4th year?  If not, how is Hardy a UFA but not LaFell?  Same draft.

 

 

Hardy was a late rounder.

Sent from the Carolina Huddle App

 

The round drafted makes no difference as to whether a player is a RFA or UFA, just credited years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can somebody who has the time go and see how many of Cam's interceptions came when Lafell was the intended target? I'm willing to be at least 90%

 

I know you are joking but this year, 5 of Cam's 15 INTs were targeted to LaFell. 4 for Smitty, 3 for Ginn, 1 for Olsen, 1 for Hixon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To kick this up, The Athletic has a really comprehensive piece out where pretty much all QB questions are addressed. It is worth seeing.  https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7083539/2026/03/04/starting-quarterback-projections-free-agency-draft/?source=user_shared_article I’m putting something specific here but it should have a thread or something. It is an extensive exercise.  This is a dense write up with a lot of column inches used, about the Jets and Murray and Reich, all this stuff.. then it goes to backup QB and there is Dalton.  I am pasting that part: As for Dalton, Reich is installing the offense he was trying to run in Carolina in 2023 before he got fired, and Dalton was with the Panthers then; he’s an ideal option as a veteran backup to replace Taylor. Reich said this about Dalton in 2023: “The way he's throwing the football, the way he works through progressions, the way he handles the operation. … Since day one (when) he walked in the door, I'm like, 'This guy is starter-worthy.' You guys know I've said that all along. He's, in my opinion, one of the best 32 quarterbacks in the world.” ——— That’s true love lol. I never heard any of this. Pretty crazy I think, considering how the year went.   Anyway the dream is not dead. . 
    • The Seahawks traded for wide receiver/returner Rashid Shaheed at the trade deadline. He proved to be a key acquisition. Shaheed returned a punt and a kickoff for touchdowns in the regular season and had a 95-yard kickoff return in the postseason. Shaheed, though, is scheduled for free agency. So, the 12 games he played, including the postseason, might be the extent of his time in Seattle. Adam Schefter of ESPN reports that Shaheed and the Seahawks are not close to an extension, and the expectation is that the two-time Pro Bowler will hit free agency. Shaheed has 153 receptions for 2,243 yards and 12 touchdowns in his four-year career to go along with three punt return touchdowns and a kickoff return touchdown. He ranks 13th on PFT’s top-100 free agents. https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/report-rashid-shaheed-appears-headed-to-free-agency
×
×
  • Create New...