Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is a lack of receivers really the problem?


SauceBoss

Recommended Posts

Or is it the lack of time Cam has in the pocket. A few things of note is that Cam lacked in deep balls this year. This was mainly due to the line. Now, when Cam had time against the Niners, he picked them apart and nailed a perfect pass to smith. Now we definitely need a WR, but maybe the focus should be on overhauling the line and not forking out completely for a WR. Not to mention, our line gets absolutely NO push, and isn't great at opening holes. We could have Megatron out there, but if Cam is constantly under pressure and either doesn't have time to throw, or have errand throws,then even Megatron would have a down year. There's so many offseason threads on here asking the same damn questions, but where's this one? For fug sake, we had a third tier defensive tackle starting at right guard for us!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Generally Cam holds onto the ball longer then most other qbs trying to make something happen because the wr's couldn't get separation. Which has the effect of making the line look worse, while the oline needs to be improved and the team needs a long term LT, it also desperately needs youth and talent at the Wr position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://espn.go.com/blog/carolina-panthers/post/_/id/4289/gap-between-seattle-and-carolina-is-secondary

 

I still don't think WR is going to be the answer. IF we go after the caliber of CB or OL that we would a WR, i personally think it would bring those levels up to sustainable. I wouldn't be surprised to see them go with CB in first round either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not think it is the problem but it is part of the problem. I think our inability to run the ball is mostly to blame.When you can run it opens up our passing game.

 

Having said that we do need a receiver that can get separation and hold on to the ball. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Outside of Ginn on long routes, our receivers struggle to get separation. Olson is the only "receiver" that can regularly get open and separate. This makes a big difference because Cam always has to fit the ball in a tight window.

Smitty is a stud, but he needs to be in the slot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Outside of Ginn on long routes, our receivers struggle to get separation. Olson is the only "receiver" that can regularly get open and separate. This makes a big difference because Cam always has to fit the ball in a tight window.

Smitty is a stud, but he needs to be in the slot.

I agree separation is what we are missing in the passing game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The year he had another edge rusher opposite him in Reddick, Reddick ended up having more sacks. Burns was good at rushing the passer here but he was taken out of plays far too often by a single TE or you'd never even known he was in the game at all.  The Rams offer was equivalent to prime Khalil Mack or a TJ Watt. Those guys single handedly took over games and stopped drives. I can't remember a game Burns ever did that. Do we wish we had the level of production hes giving right now? Of course. Do I think we'd have it here. No.  At the time, his production was on par with Reddick, not Parsons. Pay production and incentivise potential. 
    • Technically our guys are in the top 6 in sacks for rookies and Scourton is tied for the lead.
    • That's why so many said he wasn't worth it here, there was only DB and it wasn't enough. If Burns is feasting then the other guys in NY are doing enough already, Burns is just collecting the stats. It's what he eas built for and is finally in his perfect space to succeed. Im not as in on the new guys yet. More is an understatement but the good news is that they are rookies.
×
×
  • Create New...