Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is a lack of receivers really the problem?


SauceBoss

Recommended Posts

Or is it the lack of time Cam has in the pocket. A few things of note is that Cam lacked in deep balls this year. This was mainly due to the line. Now, when Cam had time against the Niners, he picked them apart and nailed a perfect pass to smith. Now we definitely need a WR, but maybe the focus should be on overhauling the line and not forking out completely for a WR. Not to mention, our line gets absolutely NO push, and isn't great at opening holes. We could have Megatron out there, but if Cam is constantly under pressure and either doesn't have time to throw, or have errand throws,then even Megatron would have a down year. There's so many offseason threads on here asking the same damn questions, but where's this one? For fug sake, we had a third tier defensive tackle starting at right guard for us!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Generally Cam holds onto the ball longer then most other qbs trying to make something happen because the wr's couldn't get separation. Which has the effect of making the line look worse, while the oline needs to be improved and the team needs a long term LT, it also desperately needs youth and talent at the Wr position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://espn.go.com/blog/carolina-panthers/post/_/id/4289/gap-between-seattle-and-carolina-is-secondary

 

I still don't think WR is going to be the answer. IF we go after the caliber of CB or OL that we would a WR, i personally think it would bring those levels up to sustainable. I wouldn't be surprised to see them go with CB in first round either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not think it is the problem but it is part of the problem. I think our inability to run the ball is mostly to blame.When you can run it opens up our passing game.

 

Having said that we do need a receiver that can get separation and hold on to the ball. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Outside of Ginn on long routes, our receivers struggle to get separation. Olson is the only "receiver" that can regularly get open and separate. This makes a big difference because Cam always has to fit the ball in a tight window.

Smitty is a stud, but he needs to be in the slot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Outside of Ginn on long routes, our receivers struggle to get separation. Olson is the only "receiver" that can regularly get open and separate. This makes a big difference because Cam always has to fit the ball in a tight window.

Smitty is a stud, but he needs to be in the slot.

I agree separation is what we are missing in the passing game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Like your sense of humor.  The answers we seek often lies in the question we ask.
    • This is going to be one of the more competitive camps we've had at WR in awhile... The only locks are XL, TMac, and AT. Coker and Horn Jr both have strong chances at making it. I can see David Moore being WR6. Renfrow might be the WR7 if they decide to carry that many, or he could join Dan Chisena on the PS (who gets stashed to help on ST more than at WR).
    • Sure, but I have long acknowledged he got better.  He went from horrific to mid-lower end starter.  But now you can’t say that…..you got people wanting to spin top 10 play if you look at it this way, great deep ball passer if you only acknowledge x.   I mean the headline in that article is nice for fans to run with.   But in reality Bryce Young was not the best deep passer in week 12.  Far from it.  He went 2 of 7 with no TDs deep.  The week was full of guy who went something along the lines of 3 of 4 with a bomb TD.   So Bryce then gets appointed best deep passer for say….plays like a 50/50 jump ball while trailing late to a fully covered AT that goes incomplete but could have been something given how the defender played it….not an actual good play.  But that could have been a good play.  I mean, same play could have been a pick if everything else was the same and the defender who had AT blanketed played the ball better (nothing changes for Bryce in terms of what he did.  It’s just a 50/50ish ball to someone covered)….and his entire best deep passer week 12 is built off plays that never happened over guys that actually got it done.   we should be happy Bryce with from shouldn’t of been drafted play to serviceable starter last year.  But all this spin that he is somehow actually sneaky great just ain’t something I’m doing yet 
×
×
  • Create New...