Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Smith gone due to being outspoken about Shula


Cary Kollins

Recommended Posts

Do you actually think that Smitty's personality and ego would allow him to take a more passive presence on this team and in the locker room?  No way.

 

Been said....not about the money.  So, there must have been real big issues with his antics.

 

Strange indeed.

 

he has said for years he's wanted to play in the slot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Martz is a fuging idiot. Yeah, Steve lost a step, but it wasn't like he only had 400 receiving yards.

 

He was not talking about last year, he was referring to next year.  I think his point was, "He can hit the wall at any time."  I think he has already started to slow down.  

 

The bottom line, if we kept him, we would pay dearly to watch him slow down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no i think what people are saying is we don't have any other options and cutting him has put us in panic mode to land Hakeem Nicks. What if we don't land him?

 

That is a valid point.

 

But, his antics must have been a HUGE issue for JR to allow this to happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is from an inferior site.  I'm not one to read that site ever but this is actually new and interesting info.

 

 

take it for what it's worth...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

lol at autoedit and unlinkability

if this is the case it is another example of the legend of G-man and the real G-man  being far from each other. if Smith called out Shula isn't that just being up front.Many have had the same sentiment that Smith has on the effectiveness of Shula's offense.then in the same post it states G-man looked at Smitty film and decided he had to go instead of the one running the whole crappy Offense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you actually think that Smitty's personality and ego would allow him to take a more passive presence on this team and in the locker room? No way.

Been said....not about the money. So, there must have been real big issues with his antics.

Strange indeed.

Why did Hardy say losing Smith would be huge in the locker room?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

compared to when his antics really were huge and he kept him? something stinks about this whole deal.

 

You mean those times when he was also one of the top WR's in the game....as opposed to now when he is aging, slowing, and much less production.

 

You are still in love with the Smitty of old....not the WR that he really is now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was not talking about last year, he was referring to next year.  I think his point was, "He can hit the wall at any time."  I think he has already started to slow down.  

 

The bottom line, if we kept him, we would pay dearly to watch him slow down.

fi we had a high powered offense and he couldn't keep up that would be one thing. I don't see this as being on Smith as much as the offense he is trying to work out of.I guess where he lands will answer this question and i don't think the fans are going to like how it turns out.well, except for the fans of his new team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude I've been talking to says this is BS, Gettleman just wants to clean house with the old guard and bring in the new leadership with Cam and Luke.

 

Says Gross wouldn't have been retained even if he didn't retire.

 

Says the players are not fans of Getts because he is being a hardass and no longer does the Hurney over-loyalty thing. runs things very business-like. 

 

This is also the first year in which Jerry has decided to be completely hands off, which is why these changes are taking place. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea the problem is Smitty is correct.

 

Not quite sure if you're attempting sarcasm or not, to be honest...  I'll assume you are...

 

We both know Smith would never be outspoken to the media...  Would never be outspoken about his role in the offense...  Would never be aggressive towards teammates...  Would never be a poor mentor to young players...

 

Now, sarcasm aside, I love me some Smitty, and I hate to see him go as much as anyone...  But that report is one I can believe, from a position of what the FO may feel he brings to the locker room...  And if that's their feeling, I can understand their wanting to move forward...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No matter what we still need a QB2 with potential to be a QB1. Keep throwing QBs at the wall until we find someone who sticks.
    • Lot of different agendas dictating opinions.  I don’t think it was the best use of money with Hunt, specifically, but the concept of OL, I am a fan. I didn’t complain a ton because I am a believer in winning up front, on both sides of the ball. I’d rather have stout fronts than fancy WRs. I have complained some about Hunt not being worth his deal, after seeing him get pushed around in a game or two. It’s no crusade. And have complained in the context of shorting the defense.   They have leveled out the FA imbalance with the dual big signings this offseason, and it has always been the draft picks I am most protective of. Anyway The picks are the real imbalance. If you did a trade chart value of the picks we directly gave up for Bryce, and added the support picks invested for skill players, and put that on one side… then put the little 3 3rd rounders and a 2nd that the defense got over three years on the other it would be hugely out of balance. I just want the balance restored. Defense is still owed.    
    • I'm one of the ones that won't let it go because it didn't solve the problem. We didn't address the center position which was a huge mistake. We were in position to easily take 2 or the top IOL. Instead of drafting JPJ over XL or Frazier over Brooks, we relied on an oft injured guard to center conversion and lo and behold, it failed as predicted. XL looks like a 1 year college wonder and an injured Brooks hasn't even surpassed Eric Shelton.  Bryce was also benched for poor performance, so the issue that many claimed was solely bad oline play wasn't. It didn't fix him bailing out of tight pockets because of being unable to see the field or him refusing to work on his atrocious footwork. Then there's the $$$. Lewis got a good guard payday. Hunt got a tackle payday. Pay tackles, draft guards, if you can.  I have no issues addressing problems through FA. It was not addressing C at all that's been the issue and still has been. Ryan Kalil was the anchor of our offensive line. We had years of solid center play and it showed. Now we're still piecemealing the center position with an expensive oline and it's still a shitshow. Why? Because the player responsible for what happens on the line presnap has little to no experience doing it. We did acquire a FA center this year finally. We'll see how much that impacts the line.  Spending on a center, whether it be through draft or FA is not bad. It's not a position that can have anyone just thrown in with no drop off in performance. A great center lifts the play of the guards on each side.  I don't like how we've built the line because we've ignored the hinge pin that everyone counts on every play. And the reality of the situation is, it didn't solve the actual problems with Bryce because those have nothing to do with the oline. 
×
×
  • Create New...