Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade Charles Johnson for D-Jax?


cardiackat88.

Recommended Posts

If we trade CJ we are fuged. I don't know why people want to trade him. It's not a coincidence that every game he was out, we lost. We went hard in the beginning of our second game against SF... then he got injured.

 

CJ > Hardy. And CJ is the reason Hardy gets a lot of his sacks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we trade CJ we are fuged. I don't know why people want to trade him. It's not a coincidence that every game he was out, we lost. We went hard in the beginning of our second game against SF... then he got injured.

 

CJ > Hardy. And CJ is the reason Hardy gets a lot of his sacks.

 

We did?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Barry McCaulkinor

Any idea that consists of breaking up that front 7 when it's just at the cusp of being legendary is stupid as hell. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we should want to keep hardy long term and send big money johnson on his was in 2 or 3 years , when he is older and his contact would clear some real cap space ... Either way we need to sign hardy long term

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No and no. Whether trade Hardy for Jackson and 1st round pick instead. Get Hardy 13.1 million off the books. CJ is a better overall player. People keep forgetting Hardy got a lot of his sacks against sucky olineman this past season. I whether be him then CJ.

 

I love reading your posts so much. You're such a fuggin idiot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As was suggested earlier in the thread, if you trade CJ you accelerate his dead cap money so you would owe 16 million which is the same as he costs if we keep him.  Plus if you take on Jackson you owe him 10 million in salary.  We don't have million in cap space to sign him and we sure can't afford another 16 million in dead cap space making the total almost 37 million counting Smitty.

 

Why not trade Hardy for Jackson?  Because Jackson won't impact us nearly as much as Hardy.  The best receiver averages perhaps 4 or 5 catches a game.  An impact DE averages 35 plays and impacts both the run and passing game.  Plus we don't need a whiny bitch like Jackson.  Give me the Kraken who was happy to work for the tag with no whining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...