Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Outside perspective on our offseason


Jackofalltrades

Recommended Posts

http://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/2014/03/22/carolina-panthers-having-trying-offseason/FtEGHoy6pbjyle4bPYXiwM/story.html

Short piece from the Boston Globe that I think is very accurate. The writer doesn't have any of the emotional attachments many of us carry and is able to view the situation in a pure football sense.

Second-year general manager Dave Gettleman, a Dorchester native and longtime scout with the Bills and Giants, has taken heat after making unpopular decisions this offseason. But upon closer examination, there’s solid football and economic reasoning behind most of Gettleman’s moves, and there’s still plenty of reason for optimism in Charlotte.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is some nice journalism.

 

Understanding the beauty of what Gettlemen is doing takes a mature, complex, holistic look at everything we know he has to consider and an understanding that there are things we do not know.  It really pissed me off when people were bashing him because it was stupid on all levels. Yes, even those who support Gettlemen were disappointed and frustrated, but we knew that Gettlemen has not been creating problems, he has been fixing them.  We also knew that Gettlemen has an eye for talent and did some pretty impressive bottom fishing last year.  How do you complain about 12-4 on a budget?  They found a way.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've known this all along, and I'm hoping that in the end, we're younger and better for it. I did not like the letting go of Mitchell, and I loathed the way the Smitty situation was handled.

If you actually paid attention this off season, every team cut older players due to monstrous contracts. The entire League did it, not just a few teams. Want to know why? This is a copycat league and the Seahawks just won the SB and shut down the most productive offense in the history of the league with relatively no name players. What's more, they're like the second youngest team in the NFL behind only the Rams I believe. Sure they have some "big names" now, but Sherman was drafted in the 6th rnd I believe.

Bottom line is, we all need to show some patience throughout this process. Losing Smitty the way we did is why everyone was so rabid, and rightfully so. We just need to regain some perspective. That's hard to do though, especially when you read an article that refers to the Ravens' WR Steve Smith. Maybe I need anger management.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is some nice journalism.

 

Understanding the beauty of what Gettlemen is doing takes a mature, complex, holistic look at everything we know he has to consider and an understanding that there are things we do not know.  It really pissed me off when people were bashing him because it was stupid on all levels. Yes, even those who support Gettlemen were disappointed and frustrated, but we knew that Gettlemen has not been creating problems, he has been fixing them.  We also knew that Gettlemen has an eye for talent and did some pretty impressive bottom fishing last year.  How do you complain about 12-4 on a budget?  They found a way.

 

The only problem I've had at all with what Gettleman has done is the way in which he cut Smitty. I guess you can call it learning through the experiences, and he needs more time, etc. But he did not handle that the right way at all. And also, if Hardy plays on the tag this year and doesn't get 20+ sacks, I'd be pissed. We need to lock him up long term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, but I don't see how the article accurately reflects or even really addresses what made this off-season so "trying", which was really the release of Smitty (which I think that most would agree now really wasn't an economic move, or at least that's what the FO said).  The fan base was really "good" until that happened.  

 

Of course there are fans who believe that tagging Hardy was not the right move, but I feel that most of us would have supported Dave Gettleman either way in reference to tagging Hardy.  Tagging Hardy didn't cause the firestorm in the fan base, and that's what the article is indirectly really speaking to.  But most fans already knew that it was going to be fiscally difficult this off-season (as it will next off-season, perhaps even more so). G-man had a great amount of equity and goodwill due to the 12-4 record last season. Though he abruptly ended the "honeymoon" with the fans by mishandling the Smitty situation, the proof of the pudding of his success is going to be what happens during the season.

 

To me the article is kind of like preaching to the choir at this point.  I just see the article as nothing special, if not a little vanilla. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...

 

To me the article is kind of like preaching to the choir at this point.  I just see the article as nothing special, if not a little vanilla. 

 

I agree to an extent.  It definitely doesn't read as "unbiased" but I agree with most if not all of the points in the article.  But its all things that we've all been discussing for a few days if not weeks by now.

 

Hardy was viewed as one of the key players.  He very well may have been our best player down the stretch arguably.  We wanted to keep the front of the defense intact.

 

The backlash towards the FO stems from how much of a weakness our offense was last year imo.  Fans remember how much we struggled in this department over the last two years.  Now we are seemingly getting weaker.  But I argue we need a youth movement as well as we need to address the Cam contract.  We are doing what we have to do.  Which most of us have known for sometime now.  Thus I read the article with the feeling these points are being rehashed to get some boston globe readers to back a boston guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...