Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Yellowstone Animals Fleeing Park


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

 

Videos showing animals fleeing America's Yellowstone National Park has prompted concerns the supervolcano beneath is about to erupt.

Footage appears to show bison and other animals in an exodus from the park causing a number of bloggers to speculate this could mean the volcano is about to explode, The Epoch Times reports.

The authors say that an earthquake that hit the area on 30 March appeared to have sent the animals scurrying for safety, and that this is could spell disaster for the volcano, which last erupted 640,000 years ago.

In a YouTube clip titled ALERT! Yellowstone Buffalo Running for Their Lives! bison are shown running along the road away from the park.

Blogger Jay Lee wrote in a post on his site tatoott1009.com: "Whether I believe this, or whether I don't believe the story or not, I don't know. I can tell you this story I saw this morning about the buffaloes running the street ... whether or not it's because of any activity in Yellowstone or not, I don't know.

"But I'll tell you this, whatever the case may be, that their running away from Yellowstone is an alert of some sort.

 

"It also could be from this video, where poachers are killing them, chasing them, abusing them, running them around. Could be hundreds of things for them to be running. I wanted you to listen [to the videos] and make up your own mind on what to think."

While volcanic activity at Yellowstone has been frequently debated, as have what would happen if the volcano were to erupt, recently researchers have suggested the volcano may be dying.

Ken Sims, from the University of Wyoming, said air and water samples taken from the world's largest volcano suggests it could be dying.

After measuring the acidity in water samples and radon in the air, they found that rather than erupting, the volcano may be on the verge of extinction, the Star Tribune reported.

In spite of reports like these, bloggers continue to speculate on the catastrophic threat an eruption from Yellowstone would pose. Tom Lupshu, who claims to be a "survivalist and search and rescue expert", said many winter elk from Yellowstone were missing.

"Herds of bison running for their lives on the public roadways and they were not being chased or rounded up, the bison were running down the mountain slopes onto roadways running right past a filming crew. They detect something vast and deadly. The Yellowstone Supervolcano is the only thing there that would fit the bill," he wrote.

 

 

 

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/yellowstone-animals-fleeing-park-raises-fears-supervolcano-set-102516177.html#Jbbob25

 

 

Here's a seismic activity in Yellowstone in the last 5 days.

 

 
 MAG    DATE    LOCAL-TIME  LAT     LON    DEPTH    LOCATION
        y/m/d     h:m:s     deg     deg     km

 2.4  2014/04/03 05:09:26 44.528N 111.144W 13.6   15 km ( 9 mi) SSW of  West Yellowstone, MT

1.5  2014/04/03 03:49:12 44.761N 110.772W 9.2   29 km (18 mi) ENE of  West Yellowstone, MT

1.4  2014/04/03 03:49:06 44.758N 110.775W 9.6   28 km (18 mi) ENE of  West Yellowstone, MT

2.1  2014/04/02 22:55:23 44.746N 110.765W 7.7   29 km (18 mi) ENE of  West Yellowstone, MT

2.1  2014/04/02 05:02:08 44.843N 110.990W 9.3   22 km (14 mi) NNE of  West Yellowstone, MT

1.6  2014/04/02 02:54:15 44.737N 110.770W 5.1   28 km (17 mi) ENE of  West Yellowstone, MT

1.5  2014/04/01 04:20:44 44.684N 111.884W 0.3   43 km (27 mi) NE  of  Spencer, ID

3.1 2014/03/31 22:32:45 44.751N 110.656W 3.6 32 km (20 mi) S of Gardiner, MT

2.1  2014/03/31 22:32:28 44.775N 110.648W 4.4   29 km (18 mi) S   of  Gardiner, MT

2.1  2014/03/31 11:58:27 44.748N 110.660W 3.1   32 km (20 mi) S   of  Gardiner, MT

1.6  2014/03/31 11:39:44 44.598N 110.371W 5.2   56 km (35 mi) SSE of  Gardiner, MT

1.2  2014/03/31 08:45:45 44.734N 110.771W 4.5   28 km (17 mi) ENE of  West Yellowstone, MT

0.8  2014/03/31 08:23:12 44.569N 110.746W 6.1   30 km (19 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT

1.0  2014/03/31 07:38:01 44.565N 110.737W 7.7   31 km (19 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT

0.7  2014/03/31 07:27:41 44.566N 110.746W 7.7   30 km (19 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT

1.7  2014/03/31 07:07:50 44.741N 110.762W 8.1   29 km (18 mi) ENE of  West Yellowstone, MT

0.9  2014/03/31 07:02:11 44.567N 110.747W 4.6   30 km (19 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT

1.6  2014/03/31 02:31:03 44.787N 110.682W 3.8   28 km (17 mi) S   of  Gardiner, MT

1.3  2014/03/31 00:44:03 44.758N 110.647W 3.6   31 km (20 mi) S   of  Gardiner, MT

1.4  2014/03/30 22:06:41 44.767N 110.687W 2.4   30 km (19 mi) S   of  Gardiner, MT

1.7  2014/03/30 21:28:49 44.787N 110.686W 3.8   28 km (17 mi) S   of  Gardiner, MT

1.5  2014/03/30 19:07:52 44.744N 110.769W 6.6   28 km (17 mi) ENE of  West Yellowstone, MT

1.3  2014/03/30 16:29:54 44.498N 110.582W 5.5   45 km (28 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT

1.4  2014/03/30 16:24:50 44.507N 110.597W 2.0   44 km (27 mi) ESE of  West Yellowstone, MT

2.0  2014/03/30 14:32:57 44.773N 110.685W 3.3   29 km (18 mi) S   of  Gardiner, MT

1.6  2014/03/30 14:32:18 44.760N 110.680W 1.5   31 km (19 mi) S   of  Gardiner, MT

2.0  2014/03/30 12:58:10 44.784N 110.710W 4.1   28 km (17 mi) S   of  Gardiner, MT

1.3  2014/03/30 12:48:30 44.784N 110.785W 5.3   29 km (18 mi) S   of  Gardiner, MT

1.7  2014/03/30 11:49:20 44.775N 110.678W 1.0   29 km (18 mi) S   of  Gardiner, MT

1.6  2014/03/30 11:46:50 44.786N 110.720W 3.6   28 km (17 mi) S   of  Gardiner, MT

3.7 2014/03/30 09:12:24 44.781N 110.722W 3.5 28 km (18 mi) S of Gardiner, MT

3.4 2014/03/30 09:07:49 44.788N 110.705W 5.1 28 km (17 mi) S of Gardiner, MT

3.6 2014/03/30 07:30:52 44.770N 110.688W 4.4 30 km (18 mi) S of Gardiner, MT

4.8 2014/03/30 06:34:39 44.772N 110.685W 5.6 29 km (18 mi) S of Gardiner, MT

3.4 2014/03/30 04:36:25 44.772N 110.684W 3.9 29 km (18 mi) S of Gardiner, MT

3.0 2014/03/30 00:23:48 44.787N 110.676W 4.1 28 km (17 mi) S of Gardiner, MT

 

 

http://www.seis.utah.edu/recenteqs/Maps/111-44.html

 

 

You can clearly see many small tremors in 2 particular areas... these are ongoing tremors.  This means pressure is building under the earth crust. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We're in alignment regarding Thielen not being a game changer/breaker for the Panthers. Getting the ball into hands of playmakers like TMac and XL is going to open up things more than it is getting it to Thielen underneath (or letting him go after 50/50 balls 20yds downfield in his mid-30s). However, in a room where the other guys are two second year guys and two rookies, having a reliable vet that they can learn from is just as important as it is for the QB to have as a reliable third option. I can see that being worth $8.5M (just 3%) of the $279.2M cap... especially when looking at what's left out there: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/_/position/wr However, the idea that the team is forcing production to Thielen and leading to losses isn't supported by the data. Targets, not receiving yards, are how you can tell if a player is being "force fed." In the two games mentioned, let's look at the other players available... vs. TB 10 targets - Adam Thielen 9 targets - David Moore 8 targets - Tommy Tremble, Xavier Legette 3 targets - Jonathon Brooks 1 target - Dan Chisena, Feleipe Franks, Stephen Sullivan vs. PHI 11 targets - Adam Thielen 8 targets - Xavier Legette 5 targets - Chuba Hubbard, David Moore 2 targets - Tommy Tremble 1 target - Ja'Tavion Sanders, Deven Thompkins There isn't exactly a bounty of other names to throw the ball to. In those games, AT was one of the top 2 WRs. Diontae had been gone by that point.   So... yea. Agreed that Thielen isn't exactly carrying the team in his mid-30s, but it's undeniable that he was the most reliable target last season that still has quite a bit of value this season. Whether or not that value is reflected in a manner folks think on the contract is going to come down to personal taste. However, the idea that the team was forcing production to AT and that was the reason behind some losses couldn't be further from the truth.
    • I would also add that I think it's more than money.  AT has looked absolutely miserable out there at times, and there was a lot of speculation he would demand to be traded.  Personally, I thought he was a lock to be moved last year.  Maybe his hamstring is the only thing that prevents that from happening. The fact that he's not only willing to come back and play, but excited about it, really bodes well for Bryce.  AT is a veteran and he knows the game.  If he didn't have confidence in Bryce, I guarantee you he wouldn't be in a Panther uniform this year.  I'll take that as a positive.
×
×
  • Create New...