Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Are we interested in Chris Johnson?


FearTheCats

Recommended Posts

Tolbert is an All-Pro, Williams isn't the RB he was three years ago but you'd be lying if you said he still doesn't have his wheels, Stewart, prior to this last season, was (still could be) very dependable, and Barner is a project. The O-Line has gotta be fixed though.

 

The OL is the two ton elephant in the room. We clearly cannot fix it bringing in vet minimum players and the way I see it we will not get immediate relief in the draft at least at LT.......so that leaves shuffling around our existing OL.Kugzilla was injured picking up a twinky so his durability is questionable.......Williams coming off an injury....and the guy Geman feels can play LT because he is left handed Bell. 

 

Without an OL our running and passing game will be limited

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously we are not going to sign him.

Also, YPC with him is a little deceiving. Watch him. He is the type that gives you runs of 1,0,2,2,2,20 yds and comes out with 4+ ypc avg. He doesnt consistantly deliver play after play. Now, that may be a scheme thing; that may be a line issue, but I think it is most likely just who he is. I'd rather watch the tolldozer any day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously we are not going to sign him.

Also, YPC with him is a little deceiving. Watch him. He is the type that gives you runs of 1,0,2,2,2,20 yds and comes out with 4+ ypc avg. He doesnt consistantly deliver play after play. Now, that may be a scheme thing; that may be a line issue, but I think it is most likely just who he is. I'd rather watch the tolldozer any day.

 

I like the big play threat in a RB. One could argue AP is like that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...