Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

D-Will in shock over loss of receiving corp


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

LOL yep!How about how bad he is because he isn't Jim Brown or because he isn't AP? What LT did has nothing to do with DeAngelo. I really don't see a Tomlinson or Brown waiting in the wings or the draft to take Williams place.

So are you admitting he isn't as good as those guys or that you guys like to pretend he is too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't necessarily need better rushers. We've made it to the playoffs without a 1000 yard rusher multiple times in our history and we can do it again. The obstacle is that we're paying a franchise back premium for an 800 yard rusher when we could be spending that money on more important positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So are you admitting he isn't as good as those guys or that you guys like to pretend he is too?

 

I don't know who "you guys" are. Are you talking to me or a general group of posters you assign one thought to? Who are "those guys"?  I haven't proposed a pretend scenario for D-Will. Do you mean Brown and AP? I haven't seen anyone say he is as good as them, just you suggesting that it was said or thought.  Williams stands on his own and his performance has been affected by the OL and the scheme. Block for him and he can make plays.  he is a back you need to get out in space , he is not a power runner.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't necessarily need better rushers. We've made it to the playoffs without a 1000 yard rusher multiple times in our history and we can do it again. The obstacle is that we're paying a franchise back premium for an 800 yard rusher when we could be spending that money on more important positions.

 

and the 800 yd rusher can be a 1000 yd rusher with some better schemes and better blocking.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know who "you guys" are. Are you talking to me or a general group of posters you assign one thought to? Who are "those guys"? I haven't proposed a pretend scenario for D-Will. Do you mean Brown and AP? I haven't seen anyone say he is as good as them, just you suggesting that it was said or thought. Williams stands on his own and his performance has been affected by the OL and the scheme. Block for him and he can make plays. he is a back you need to get out in space , he is not a power runner.

Because other people have asserted he's that good based on their implication.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're the one who doesn't understand...DWill isn't as good as Lynch it's that simple.

He compares with Lynch in YPC and that's where it ends,

Why do you suppose they drafted Stewart in the 1st round if they thought DWill was really this special workhorse back like Lynch? Aside from Fox/Hurney being morons the answer is because he isn't.

Personally I would have drafted Albert or Cherilus with the pick we used on Stewart because many on this board were down with Ray Rice or Matt Forte and had numerous discussions about going OT in the 1st that year and if needed RB in the later rounds because there was depth there that year.(and this is not hind sight 20/20 bullshit people like to overuse)

This was poo that we went over on this board before, during, and after that draft. We had no business trading up and wasting another first round pick to hop back in the first round of that draft.

The issue was that Fox didn't like starting younger guys and DWill sat behind foster so we didn't know what we had in him too much and you could get the impression that DWill wasn't too big on Fox's favorites list. The fool kept Foster for how long? Crazy...

I was all for Albert and Forte... Bc Gross was looking old then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was all for Albert and Forte... Bc Gross was looking old then.

 

 

Well Gross can also play extremely well at RT...which he would have done and excelled at as well...

 

Gross was sick at RT his rookie year.

 

Think about the position we'd be in now with BA and Forte instead of having the whole Otah/Stewart/Williams debacle.

 

Although we would have had to pay Forte decent money I seriously doubt we would have kept Williams when it was time for his renewal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are any of you youngsters in college majoring in psychology?

It would make for an interesting paper if you could study sports franchise fanbases to learn about their shattered psyche.

Some of you are like battered wives that refuse to see what's plainly in front of them.

We went 12-4 this year mainly on the backs of the new blood players we brought in, not the old guard that have just been collecting checks without the results. And yet here you are, vehemently defending so many of them. It really is an interesting look into the mind of a people who have been shat on for so long that they start to say please and thank you when shat on again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Wow, didn't catch that!  I don't think Chuba's a power back either but he's usually good at getting that 1 or 2 yards. That was an uncharacteristic day for him.
    • The referee assigned to this game is Shawn Smith. This is a critical data point for betting purposes because his crew has one of the most distinct, long-term statistical biases in the NFL. "Road Team" Bias: Historically, Shawn Smith is known as the "Road Team Referee." In a league where home teams usually win ~55% of the time, home teams in Smith's games have historically won at a rate far below league average (often hovering around 40-42%). Against The Spread (ATS): The trend is even starker here. Home teams have covered the spread at a rate of roughly 37-40% in his career. The Mechanism: Analysis shows his crew tends to call a higher rate of False Start and Unnecessary Roughness penalties on the Home Team. This negates the traditional home-field advantage (crowd noise causing false starts for the visitors). Impact on This Game: This specific assignment heavily favors the Buccaneers (Road Team). If you believe the referee influences the game, Smith's presence suggests the Panthers will struggle to get "home cooking" calls and may face untimely procedural flags that stall drives. The Panthers have only had Shawn Smith officiate four home games since he became a head referee in 2018, and they are all losses. Date Opponent Result Score Nov 24, 2024 vs. Kansas City Chiefs Loss 27–30 Oct 9, 2022 vs. San Francisco 49ers Loss 15–37 Dec 12, 2021 vs. Atlanta Falcons Loss 21–29 Nov 25, 2018 vs. Seattle Seahawks Loss 27–30   Considering the how rare it is for Shawn Smith to officiate a Panthers game at all, this seems like an odd time to assign him to a Panthers game, unless the NFL wants to kill the Panthers season once and for all.  The Panthers' offensive line situation creates a "perfect storm" for referee Shawn Smith's specific tendency to call False Starts on the home team. The "Carousel" Factor (Communication Vulnerability) The most damning stat for the Panthers' offensive line in 2025 is their lack of continuity. The Stat: By Week 13, the Panthers had already fielded their 10th different offensive line combination. The Impact: False starts are often "communication penalties"—they happen when a guard doesn't hear the center's snap count or a tackle anticipates the wrong cadence. A unit that hasn't played together struggles with non-verbal communication. The Shawn Smith Multiplier: Shawn Smith’s crew calls False Starts at a high rate on home teams. He will likely look for flinches on the exterior of the line. A disjointed line that is constantly rotating players (due to the injuries of starters like Cade Mays and the illness issues with Robert Hunt earlier this season) is "fresh meat" for this specific referee bias. The Specific Culprits (2025 Penalties) Ikem Ekwonu (LT): Leads the team with 4 False Start penalties this season. He is the most frequent violator on the line. Taylor Moton (RT): Has been flagged for 3 False Starts. The Trap: Smith’s crew often focuses on the tackles (the players furthest from the ball) jumping early to get an edge on speed rushers. Since Ekwonu struggles with this discipline naturally, having a referee who hunts for it is a massive disadvantage. The "Managed Outcome" Synthesis The "Bucs Cover" Script: If the desired outcome is a Buccaneers win to solidify their playoff standing, the officials simply have to apply the letter of the law. Calling strict False Starts on a confused, banged-up Panthers O-line will consistently put them in "3rd and Long" situations, killing their drives and allowing the Bucs (-3.5) to cover easily. The "Close Game" Script: If the desired outcome is "Week 18 Drama" (keeping the division tied), look for the officials to ignore the Panthers' twitchy tackles. If Ekwonu jumps a split-second early and no flag is thrown, it effectively neutralizes the Bucs' pass rush, allowing the Panthers to keep the score close. Summary of the Edge Vulnerability: Extreme. The Panthers are playing backup interior linemen (like Jake Curhan or practice squad call-ups) next to jumpy tackles. Betting Implication: This strongly reinforces the Bucs -3 or -3.5 play. The combination of a "Road Team Referee" and a "Home Team O-Line in chaos" suggests the Panthers will beat themselves with procedural penalties. Based on the collision of the hard data (Referee bias + Offensive Line injuries) and the soft narratives ("Managed Outcomes"), here is the definitive recommendation. If you have to place a single Moneyline bet to win this game straight up: The Pick: Tampa Bay Buccaneers (-165) While the "Entertainment Script" hints at a Panthers upset to keep the division messy, the structural disadvantage the Panthers face in this specific matchup is too massive to ignore. Here is why the Buccaneers are the stong moneyline play: 1. The "Shawn Smith" Road-Field Advantage This is the decisive factor. In the NFL, Home Field Advantage usually accounts for about 1.5 to 2 points of value. The Reality: Referee Shawn Smith negates that advantage entirely. His crew calls penalties in a way that historically suppresses home crowd momentum (False Starts, holding). The Result: You are essentially getting the Buccaneers on a neutral field (or even a "pseudo-home" field) against a team with a worse roster. 2. The "Drive-Killer" Synergy To win as an underdog, the Panthers need to play a clean, mistake-free game to keep drives alive. The combination of Panthers' 10th O-Line combo + Jump-prone Tackles (Ekwonu) + A Referee who hunts False Starts is a recipe for disaster. The Scenario: Expect the Panthers to face multiple "1st and 15" or "3rd and 12" situations due to procedural flags. These drive-killers will force them to punt or settle for field goals, while the Bucs' offense (led by Mayfield) stays on schedule. 3. The "TV Product" Counter-Argument You asked about the "Managed Outcome." While a Panthers win creates "chaos," the NFL also values Star Power in the playoffs. Baker Mayfield and the Buccaneers are a proven national TV draw with recent playoff history. If the league has to choose between "Chaos" (Panthers) and "Ratings/Legitimacy" (Bucs), the "Script" likely leans toward ensuring the Buccaneers—the more marketable team—secure the division lead. They won't "fix" the game against the Panthers, but they won't intervene to save them from their own penalties. Final Verdict Betting on the Panthers requires you to hope for a miracle 4th-quarter collapse. Betting on the Buccaneers requires you to trust that a superior roster—aided by a favorable officiating crew—will control the game for the first 45 minutes. Take the Buccaneers Moneyline. The "Safe" money is on the Ref. The Prediction: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Win and Cover Projected Score: Buccaneers 27, Panthers 17 The Bet: Buccaneers -3 (or Moneyline -165) Confidence Level: High on the Winner; Moderate on the Spread (due to potential "garbage time" variance).
×
×
  • Create New...