Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve Wyche comments on NFLN this AM reg Dwill


SCP

Recommended Posts

Most of you fail to realize that Deangelo doesn't care about the consequences of his words. He spoke out about Chud while Chud was still here. I will never blame a man for speaking his mind. Cam can't do it so somebody has to. And again if you want Deangelo to produce more, you give him the ball more it's that simple.

That's like buying a 80k car and leaving it in your garage, but complain you're not getting your money's worth. Drive the damn car, or trade it in and get a fraction of what you paid for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For many Panthers this is uncharted territory.  Under the old regime it was keep everyone happy.and be mediocre.  Under Gettleman it is different and it is taking folks some time to understand the new NFL and new way to do things.  He, like others, will be fine by the time the season starts.  Or he will be gone as well.  It is up to him to adapt.

 

yeah that's what is.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/22515049/tom-brady-could-be-without-top-5-receivers-from-last-season

 

The Pats lost their top 5 receiving targets last year (although in fairness only 3 of those were voluntary: Welker, Lloyd, Woodhead. Hernandez went to jail and Gronk was injured.). 

 

Also Bill Belichick replaced them with rookies, scrubs, and the never healthy Amendola. I don't remember hearing any Pats players bitchin'.

 

which means absolutely zero, zip,zilch,zowy, nuthin'.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nothing wrong with his comments, it just gave the haters a reason to come out the woodwork and start the annual d will sucks campaign

I've always liked Deangelo Williams, so I don't think it makes me a "hater" (btw that is the worst word in the English language) when I say he has clearly declined, isn't worth half of what he gets paid, and that he shouldn't be making public comments about the state of the organization when he is more part of the problem than he is a part of the solution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He just kept it real with how he felt. Imagine working with a group of guys to achieve a goal and you almost achieved it and made great chemistry along away. And then suddenly its blew up. I would have concerns to. But on another note I don't care who we have out there on Sundays just get the job done and win

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always liked Deangelo Williams, so I don't think it makes me a "hater" (btw that is the worst word in the English language) when I say he has clearly declined, isn't worth half of what he gets paid, and that he shouldn't be making public comments about the state of the organization when he is more part of the problem than he is a part of the solution.

 

I don't think his comments were bad so how much he makes and his production really have nothing to do with it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always liked Deangelo Williams, so I don't think it makes me a "hater" (btw that is the worst word in the English language) when I say he has clearly declined, isn't worth half of what he gets paid, and that he shouldn't be making public comments about the state of the organization when he is more part of the problem than he is a part of the solution.

 

no not these comments, there are far worst comments about him,but saying that his play doesn't back up his pay is 100% true.

 

i do disagree that he's a big part of the problem, a part but not as big to draw too much attention

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He just kept it real with how he felt. Imagine working with a group of guys to achieve a goal and you almost achieved it and made great chemistry along away. And then suddenly its blew up. I would have concerns to. But on another note I don't care who we have out there on Sundays just get the job done and win

 

What was our goal? To get our asses handed to us in the NFCCG instead of the divisional round? "Chemistry" is right up there with "competitive fire" and "nasty" as far as things that don't really matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not looking good for TB. Buffalo and Habs fans are the worst so I will be cheering for the meteor. 
    • Arguing about who had what and who did what with more is just going to end in the same charades. If we're going to waste a lot of hot air arguing then make it about something that cannot be denied. What you are seeing with your own two eyes. Cam Newton was a tremendously talented athlete albeit flawed in fundamental aspects. And although he played poorly in and lost a Super Bowl you cannot deny him that more often than not through his prime his teammates knew they could count on him to hold up his end of the bargain usually and be a key driving force for keeping them in games. Giving his defense much needed rest and motivation in wanting to match his grit as a competitor. That aspect is just not there with Bryce Young. Yeah he's dumped on the Falcons in a dome twice but what about his other 44 games? When has the Panthers defense the last three years ever looked at their starting quarterback and thought to themselves "man I'm so glad he's my QB"?
    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
×
×
  • Create New...