Steve Wyche comments on NFLN this AM reg Dwill

[AceBoogie]

Most of you fail to realize that Deangelo doesn't care about the consequences of his words. He spoke out about Chud while Chud was still here. I will never blame a man for speaking his mind. Cam can't do it so somebody has to. And again if you want Deangelo to produce more, you give him the ball more it's that simple.

That's like buying a 80k car and leaving it in your garage, but complain you're not getting your money's worth. Drive the damn car, or trade it in and get a fraction of what you paid for it.

[heel31ok]

For many Panthers this is uncharted territory.  Under the old regime it was keep everyone happy.and be mediocre.  Under Gettleman it is different and it is taking folks some time to understand the new NFL and new way to do things.  He, like others, will be fine by the time the season starts.  Or he will be gone as well.  It is up to him to adapt.

 

yeah that's what is.

 

[heel31ok]

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/22515049/tom-brady-could-be-without-top-5-receivers-from-last-season

 

The Pats lost their top 5 receiving targets last year (although in fairness only 3 of those were voluntary: Welker, Lloyd, Woodhead. Hernandez went to jail and Gronk was injured.). 

 

Also Bill Belichick replaced them with rookies, scrubs, and the never healthy Amendola. I don't remember hearing any Pats players bitchin'.

 

which means absolutely zero, zip,zilch,zowy, nuthin'.

 

[AceBoogie]

which means absolutely zero, zip,zilch,zowy, nuthin'.

They were still suppose to have Gronk and Aaron so it's not even close to the same.

[LA_Panther]

I don't get this. Our passing offense sucked a$$ last year. Besides the emotional attachment to Smitty, I really don't get the outrage

[AceBoogie]

I don't get this. Our passing offense sucked a$$ last year. Besides the emotional attachment to Smitty, I really don't get the outrage

Just because it was bad, doesn't mean it can't get worse.

[Growl]

lol at how many people's butts have puckered because a player on the team isn't taking the stance the apologists have tried to force everyone who dared questioned the team's questionable moves to take

[Cpt slay a ho]

nothing wrong with his comments, it just gave the haters a reason to come out the woodwork and start the annual d will sucks campaign

[Creepster]

 Ciriticizing management when your future is uncertain is  plain dumb

 

 

I never thought de lo was the brightest mind playing for the Panthers.

[Montsta]

nothing wrong with his comments, it just gave the haters a reason to come out the woodwork and start the annual d will sucks campaign

I've always liked Deangelo Williams, so I don't think it makes me a "hater" (btw that is the worst word in the English language) when I say he has clearly declined, isn't worth half of what he gets paid, and that he shouldn't be making public comments about the state of the organization when he is more part of the problem than he is a part of the solution.

[WildCats]

He just kept it real with how he felt. Imagine working with a group of guys to achieve a goal and you almost achieved it and made great chemistry along away. And then suddenly its blew up. I would have concerns to. But on another note I don't care who we have out there on Sundays just get the job done and win

[heel31ok]

I've always liked Deangelo Williams, so I don't think it makes me a "hater" (btw that is the worst word in the English language) when I say he has clearly declined, isn't worth half of what he gets paid, and that he shouldn't be making public comments about the state of the organization when he is more part of the problem than he is a part of the solution.

 

I don't think his comments were bad so how much he makes and his production really have nothing to do with it.

 

[Cpt slay a ho]

I've always liked Deangelo Williams, so I don't think it makes me a "hater" (btw that is the worst word in the English language) when I say he has clearly declined, isn't worth half of what he gets paid, and that he shouldn't be making public comments about the state of the organization when he is more part of the problem than he is a part of the solution.

 

no not these comments, there are far worst comments about him,but saying that his play doesn't back up his pay is 100% true.

 

i do disagree that he's a big part of the problem, a part but not as big to draw too much attention

[Khaki Lackey]

He just kept it real with how he felt. Imagine working with a group of guys to achieve a goal and you almost achieved it and made great chemistry along away. And then suddenly its blew up. I would have concerns to. But on another note I don't care who we have out there on Sundays just get the job done and win

 

What was our goal? To get our asses handed to us in the NFCCG instead of the divisional round? "Chemistry" is right up there with "competitive fire" and "nasty" as far as things that don't really matter.