Jump to content

Kuhndog94

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    5,148
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Kuhndog94

  1. I'd prefer they keep trying. Because it's apparent they can't coach for poo. If we start trying to lose, Rhule might fug up and win a game or two.
  2. Because a needy team will pay that price. I'm glad to see us walk away. It's more along the lines of what I wanted to hear. If Watson truly turned us down, it would've been embarrassing. I'd like to see how all of this legal stuff plays out first, anyways. Hope it's figured out by the off-season but stuff like this takes a while.
  3. Different sources saying different things. Don't know what to believe anymore
  4. Lol. No elite talent wants to come play for Rhule/Brady and behind this oline. Not even one who allegedly sexually assaulted over 20 women. I don't blame him one bit. (For not wanting to come here)
  5. Don't even know you, dude. Pulling the race card won't get you very far here. Some people see more than skin color, lil fella. That's all I'll say on the matter. @rayzor pinned a post to the top of this forum. Maybe you should read it.
  6. Rob definitely didn't want Sam here. His body language at the press conference said it all. Which is okay because I definitely don't want either of them here.
  7. Nah. Not really. And that's a really strange place to take my comment. Wilson simply hasn't earned that right in the eyes of the Seahawks. If the front office and the coaching staff doesn't want him to be involved, then he doesn't need to be. I didn't like Watson trying to have veto power in coaching decisions, either. How would that affect us if he was traded here? Too much control. I didn't really care for Manning doing it either, but if your coaches want you to have a say, then you have a say. If they don't, they don't. And in Wilson's case, they don't. The only QB I'd personally give veto power is Brady and thats because he's the fugin GOAT. Now you can ask for opinions, but wanting veto power on decisions is a little much for anyone not named Brady and potentially Mahomes if he maintains his current pace (barring his slump this year).
  8. He wants to be involved in roster moves and other important decisions and wants a trade because they won't give him that level on control as a player. I would say that's ego-driven, imho.
  9. Probably being conceived right around that point. Wait... am I a Panther celebration baby
  10. The problem isn't the rebuild. The problem is the apparent regression. Matt Rhule legitimately looks lost. He doesn't know what he's doing. This is as big of an implosion as we've ever had. The entire coaching staff is incompetent. That's the problem. Whose decision was it to pick up Darnold's 5th year option before he played a down for us? Whose decision was it to pay Robby that much money?
  11. Gonna trade outta the 1st, get extra 3 picks, and then pick all CBs.
  12. That's extremely weird. I mean the desire for disclosure should be a credit to Watson, right? His side is so confident that they demand everything be public? Doesn't Buzbee have a questionable past? What a weird case.
  13. Ah. Do you have any sources for that? I thought he was adamant about not paying because he thought they'd make him appear guilty.
  14. He doesn't want to do that because he feels he is innocent. He has the money to settle these claims. He doesn't want to. Because he think's he is innocent.
  15. I am concerned with trading for him and it turns out to be true. BUT if legal issues weren't a concern, I'd say 2 firsts, a 2nd, CMC and Robby is about the most I'd do. And they'd have to eat the contracts for CMC and Robby. If not, they can literally go fug themselves.
  16. I knew Darnold was bad. Been saying it all year when he was barely competent against poo teams. But damn, man... Rhule's coaching gets worse with each game. 3 Points? Against the Giants? Whew... It is possibly the most embarrassing loss in the history of this franchise.
×
×
  • Create New...