DeAngelo Beason

Once again, depth signing people. This is not a bank breaking move. They're creating depth and competition on the OL - one of the position groups where this team was terrible last year.

People are acting like this is big money. He's essentially cheap depth. Tackles are expensive. Even backups.

While I agree, this defense was already really, really, really bad last year. There aren't really many guys out there that could replace him and be an upgrade.

Paired up with a young offensive mind and innovator like Joe Brady... maybe. I wouldn't give up much for him though.

I agree. There's not enough tape to spend a top 10 pick on the guy. I'd stand by that statement even if he ends up being a pro bowler.

If you actually read what Jake said, he didn't necessarily endorse the guy. He more or less said "I've been there"

Not necessarily endorsing Jones, but I do agree that mobility is overrated. It's a band-aid that masks other glaring issues.

I don't think he would be costly at all.

Why would we not be able to afford it?

Racists.

David Newton is the one who said it. This is a pretty new story. Don't get me wrong, Newton is an idiot and this is at best well-informed speculation, but he's just as much of an insider as Voth. https://247sports.com/Article/Carolina-Panthers-quarterback-2021-season-Christian-McCaffrey-trade-Deshaun-Watson-Houston-Texans-160992696/

Never said that. I was just saying the OP was misquoted.

You mean good QBs are important and worth sacrificing a lot for? Wow.

I am not implying anything. There are insiders within the organization that have said the Panthers would include CMC in a trade that netted them Watson. Granted they are "anonymous sources", but no less legitimate than anything coming from Panthers beat writers.

Who says they want him? The only team that's actually tipped their hand at having an insane hard-on to get him is the Panthers.

I'm only saying what OP posted. Whether or not it happens is irrelevant to the discussion. And yes, it's so crazy that people are discussing trading CMC... ya know... like people who actually work for the Panthers have discussed....

Y'all have SERIOUSLY got to work on your reading comprehension...

Read again. The OP said trade #8 and CMC for Miami's #3. We would still have all of our future picks.

I agree. IF, and ONLY IF Zach Wilson is there I'd take him. Not a believer in Justin Fields or Trey Lance.

For the record, you aren't reading what OP is saying either. OP is saying trade with Miami to get the #3 pick, then use that pick and future picks to go get Watson. Not trade with Miami to get Watson after Miami already traded for him.

I don't think you're reading what I'm typing. When I say "it's feasible" I am referring to the concept of 3 team trades. I'm not talking about this specific scenario. Everyone is acting like 3 team trades don't happen or are impossible. That is absolutely untrue.

Yes, there is. I'm not suggesting we will do it, or even that it's likely that we do it. I'm saying that the concept of a 3 team trade is not as ludicrous as everyone seems to think. This has nothing to do with Watson or the Dolphins, just the idea of a 3 team trade and how people are acting like they are impossible.

I am honestly flabbergasted at the number of people that picked Teddy.

Contrary to everyone in here talking crap just to talk crap, there actually is some feasibility to this. Perhaps CMC or a player like him addresses the need of a team like the Dolphins moreso than a team like the Texans. 3 team trades are completely feasible, and this is essentially a 3 team trade.

Just not feeling it with this guy at all. We tried Cam Newton already. It went (maybe) a little above average at best.