Luciu5

I don't think it's must win, but if we lose it kinda creates a narrative where the Panthers are the dumpster fire of the year and that would stick until proven otherwise. Fans would be calling for heads to roll. Ultimately it depends on how the team responds to an L. If it destroys morale, then yes it's must win. I think if we lose though it answers right away if we are a playoff contender or not.

Can't you still protect players on the PS this year like last year?

He doesn't face other players though. All he does is look between his legs and throw the ball backwards, right? I get that in a punting situation being able to tackle is nice, but let's face it, JJ isn't tackling anyone. Fletcher doesn't need any improvement there to beat out Jansen. The cadence etc that @thefuzz mentioned makes some sense though I guess.

Is NFL long snapping that different from college? Doesn't he literally have one job? Just not sure how someone who has been doing this for years is not ready.

Which one is it? Did the CB break it up or did the receiver have butter hands?

You should do this stuff yourself before you post. You wouldn't look as dumb. 11/32 https://www.pff.com/news/ranking-the-2012-offensive-lines

A couple years back, they retooled the ratings. I'm assuming they are still using a similar rating system. They dialed back the ratings quite a bit, especially during the draft. A first round pick outside the top 10 is awesome if 72 OVR, especially if they are faster to level up. Highest player in the draft is probably 80 at best. Most of the draft is going to be 60's and lower. Your oline starters will be in the 70's unless you have some above average guys. Guards with 68 overall starting isn't uncommon.

It's certainly possible, but honestly it's a lot that has to come together; perfect storm if you will. To me, I think it comes down to Darnold playing better than he has in the past and the defense getting stops on 3rd down better than last year. I think the defense is going to be very good this year. I'm not sold on Darnold...at all.

Overall, offense, and defense ratings. Still laughable. They are seriously underrating the defense. Depending on Darnold, the offense might be right. 73 Overall 76 Offense 71 Defense

Has YGM done anything? Have not seen him mentioned really. Any gauge on our run defense?

The video doesn't really look that bad, but I'm trusting the team made the right decision and the hit was egregious enough to warrant the punishment. As a fan, I'm not going to second guess this decision for a bottom of the roster guy, but the DB coach clearly had a better view than this video and was on Ibe's ass about the hit before he even realized the extent of the potential injury to Kirkwood.

I don't think Marshall gets enough touches and yards to be OROY with DJ and Robbie ahead of him. I just don't think a WR has a chance if they aren't WR1/2. I would be pleasantly shocked if Horn is DROY. CB isn't usually a position that wins it, but this year could be different. Looking at his competition....Barmore? Paye? Surtain? Idk who will emerge as the season progresses but there isn't an obvious favorite like last year. So there's a chance I guess.

That's one sure fire way to make sure everyone clicks.

I'm really not getting why Thomas is still working with the 1's. Is he the only TE working with starters?

Was he that good, or was our offense just that bad yesterday?

You really had a Kyle Allen avatar?

I'd say left tackle is always a need until we can go into training camp knowing who is starting without question. My gut says, if that isn't Moton, then we don't have that guy yet.

Section 231 of what? I bet your talking about 47 USC 230 - the Communications Decency Act. Which has nothing to do with free speech on the internet the way you are talking about. It also does not have anything to do with breaking ToS and getting banned. It's completely irrelevant to the end user tbh. Go read something seriously because you are making yourself look....ignorant. I'm honestly trying to help you out here.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." No, it means Congress shall make no law prohibiting the free exercise of speech. Has nothing to do with forums (or social media) or any other private institution. You should do some research or take a class on the constitution. Your interpretation is just that and isn't what the plain text says nor how the courts interpret it.

Lol you have zero proof that for the majority of people "covid is a cold or less". Or proof for anything you say for that matter. https://www.google.com/search?q=world+leaders+getting+vaccinated&hl=en&sxsrf=ALeKk00R7svioqv92MlJ1Q1tdxlSIWMqjg:1627657260264&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwifksHmh4vyAhWJSzABHWx8Cq8Q_AUoAXoECAEQAw&biw=1920&bih=937 I understand this isn't proof. But are you saying, these are ALL saline injections? It's possible. It's extremely unlikely.

Cool. Then you must not mind being part of that 2% then. Your mom too? I think if someone you loved died and the world dismissed them as not worth saving or just an acceptable loss, you would think different. Anyway, have you heard about the possible long term effects of contracting COVID such as reduced lung capacity and early onset dementia? I'm sure those experimental, unapproved vaccines which were totally whipped up after a few months - not decades of research into mRNA treatment - will have way worse long term affects than the disease itself, right? It's funny how our government, nay, every government ON THE PLANET (!!!) is trying to end the human race by pushing these on the people. But not only on the people, they are using these potentially deadly vaccines with unknown long term effects on themselves too! That's how crazy governments are, not even saving themselves while attempting to end humanity.

It had better be. That pass was like 5 yards. lol

You know, my only issue with him is the team treating him like he is injury prone from the start. Not sure how to read it.

who's too much for whom.