rebelrouser

Bad Cam my ass. Cam was 66%, 2854 yds, 10.2 yd/att, 30 td, 7 int, 182 qbr Anthony Richardson was 53.8%, 2549 yds, 7.8 yd/att, 17 td, 9 int, 131 qbr

Romo sounds like he has phlegm in his throat and Olsen sounds like his balls haven't dropped yet.

Based what exactly? The fact that Florida outrecruits Kentucky virtually every year ('21 12 vs. 35, '20 9 vs. 25, '19 9 vs. 34, '18 14 vs. 37) or the fact that Florida ends up w/ a better conference record virtually every year ('22 both 3-5, '21 2-6 v. 5-3, '20 8-2 vs. 4-6, '19 6-2 vs. 3-5). So for four years UF was clearly better than UK in recruiting and record except for one single year where UK beat them with conference record. Those of you excusing AR's horrific stats due to no talent at the University of Florida are in for a rude awaking. The good news is that AR is truly the man to lead us to the number one overall pick in '24 or '25 depending on when we start him. If we hire Steichen and he uses AR in an RPO run heavy offense, he could succeed here for a few years before he starts to break down like a running back.

Weakness accuracy. You ain't kidding jack.

Man it would have been nice to take Jalen Hurts w/ our '20 second round pick. Funny we are talking about AR at#9 when we passed on Jalen at #38.

That draft screams trade back. If we couldn't, i would take the tcu wr there.

This is why i am against giving up draft capital to move down for a qb (unless it's Young or Stroud). Lots of needs at wr, te, edge, lb but lots of really good prospects who will be around in rounds two and three. We trade back and we could really get a quality wr, te, and lb(s) to add to the team.

oops. Qb this year. If we want a qb, Wilks really screwed us in that Raiders and Falcons could clean the qb board right in front of us.

The best candidates for a trade back would be qb needy teams so probably not. We certainly couldn't comfortably trade back behind the jets. It's interesting in that Atlanta, Carolina, and Tennessee all decided to take their preferred qb last year. However, everyone assumes only Carolina wants to take another q

It's both. You have to create an RPO type system for Hurts to work out. Minshew is a completely different type of quarterback so when he goes in, he is running a system built for someone very different than him. He is not a good backup for Hurts. Get a Huntley type like Ravens have so when the backup has to play, he can come in w/ the same playbook and no one has to adjust.

You serious Clark? The guy is color man who has never coached and has ties to Wilks. I hope we aren't taking advice from the media.

Frank Reich is a legit head coach candidate with interviews with several nfl teams. Why would he hitch his wagon to Wilks who got a courtesy/Rooney interview and be a coordinator? That is not happening.

Rhule screwed us putting Corral behind that crap oline in preseason. Wasn't it that fat guard from Alabama that let his man straight through that got him hurt? Deonte Brown? With a healthy Corral, the smart play we saw from other teams is to let your new draftee take his lumps and get a good draft pick. Nine just flat out sucks. Too low for a good qb, too high for Anthony Richardson, and really not sure what we do with it. WR is deep, LB is deep, and too early for a TE.

Wow, sounds like one of the other teams that needs a head coach would really want him.

He's just not worth the guaranteed contract. Serious injury and your future is wrecked. He quit on his team but so did Anthony Robinson and a lot of people want him. Deshaun wasn't worth a guaranteed contract either (no one is) but at least he can throw.

Gibbs is a better prospect but has yet to play in the NFL. The real point is that we don't need to take Gibbs at #39 with our first second round pick. That is way to high for a rb when we have much bigger needs.

I have no problem trading down like that IF we get Stroud or Young. No way we do it for Levis. I also think drafting AR at 9 and a RB with our first second round pick are wasteful. Gibbs = small version of Hubbard.

1. HC: Steichen, Johnson, or Kafka 2. QB: don't really care; just don't give up draft capital and reach for a quick fix; we have no quick fix. Get a free agent for cheap and start getting Corral and whomever we draft reps. 3. Draft: take Young, Stroud, or Levis if they drop. If not, trade back. If no trade back is worth it take the best at position of need for wr, lb, edge. 4. FA: Lavonte David lb, David Long lb, Jakobi Meyers wr. One of these three would eliminate a draft need.

Wilkes at 5 and Reich at 10 is laughable. Maybe that is being pushed so he won't sue us when he doesn't get the job. Steichen, Johnson, or Kafka...let's get it done and move on. No way cheap ass Tepper who has a fake turf field and tried to rip off a small South Carolina town is going to invest the money and contract length that Payton would demand.

We gave up a draft pick to move down. That is a wasted pick for someone you think only has back up potential. Fitterer and McAdoo obviously liked him: Also, pretty funny how people think Sam Howell is a franchise qb after a poor outing with 57.9% completion percentage. Both might be great or terrible. We don't have a big enough sample size to make that determination. One thing is for sure, Wilkes just did just enough to totally screw us for drafting a qb this year.

So you think his ceiling is backup? That means we wasted a pick on him. The truth is the he hasn't played enough for anyone to know what his ceiling is.

Guys who are in line to be a head coach aren't making a lateral move to come to Carolina and coach w/ a has been.

And some people think Chicago should trade Fields and draft a qb. He led them to the worst record in the NFL. I think Chicago trades the 1 pick for a team to take a qb and Houston takes a qb and we are left w/ Levis in that scenario.

Hell no. I think the league is changing it's tune w/ respect to running qb's. Chicago may move on from Fields, Baltimore may move on from Jackson, etc. Running qb's have the same career expectancy as rb's and we know what happened to NFL's view of rb's. And some of us want to take a slightly larger but much less talented qb in Anthony Richardson w/ the nine pick. That guaranteed contract demand is deal breaker. Might as well just give Chicago the nine for Fields and tell him no way on guaranteed deal.

1. Young 2. Stroud..............3. Levis...............................4. Richardson. The good news is that i don't think a new coach will want to take on a long term project in Richardson. He would likely be fired before Richardson gets a start.