Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

There's no way we're carrying 5 RB's on the 53


FuFuLamePoo

Recommended Posts

Stewart isn't going anywhere. When healthy he is the closest the Panthers have to a pro-bowl running back. His contract says he will be here for the next two years at least so you may as well cheer him on and hope for his health this year.

A running backs role is tough. If he gives me 14 games plus post season health I am happy. We have the depth to overcome a minor injury and hiccup considering his history. I truly hope he misses no more than a game or two.

Barner was really bad last year. He really didn't deserve a roster spot. He ran hard in the preseason but had fumble-itis. When he got an opportunity late in the season he looked really bad. I think a previous poster pointed out his yards per carry were below 1.5. Ummm that stinks.

A few of you say he was developing. Well I say running backs don't get that opportunity. Alfred Morris was drafted in the sixth round and he is a pro bowler. Look at Tampa's running backs and how they have produced given the opportunity. Besides Barner isn't going to improve from 1.3 yards a carry to lightening in a bottle.

Barner will be shown the door at the end of cuts. He is to small to block and not fast enough to elude NFL defenders. The only thing that could possibly save him is lights out special team play returning the football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Williams is overpaid, wrong side of the 30.

Stewart is overpaid, wrong side of the 30.

Barner and Gaffney are the future with the same production. Both were outstanding in college, two different types of backs.

It seems stupid now to have geffney, but isn't it frustrating to have so kind much money tied up in RBs? Well my friends, here are your cheap, effective replacements.

 

Come on man. you don't seriously think backup caliber late round picks=first round like talents do you? Every pick the team drafts aren't franchise saviors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come on man. you don't seriously think backup caliber late round picks=first round like talents do you? Every pick the team drafts aren't franchise saviors.

I seriously think they can match their production. Yoiu dont need two first round RBs eating your cap space

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I seriously think they can match their production. Yoiu dont need two first round RBs eating your cap space

 

I seriously dout it. we are talking about guys who were once elite talents. even at this point your putting a lot of faith into guys who barely got drafted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I seriously think they can match their production. Yoiu dont need two first round RBs eating your cap space

 

Can't cut them, produces dead money, that eats up cap space.....without any hope of player production.

 

 

A late round rooking runinng back is almost never immediately thrusted into starting position, and when he is he is almost never as productive as other more talented earlier picks. No one can say why he was drafted, because honestly it was dumb af considering we only have 2 tackles on our roster.  So people crack me up trying to logically reason out a move that reallly has no basis to have been made.  It was simply a dumb pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the guy has a point. 6th rounders arent supposed to be franchise savors.

Pick OT late rounds! That hole needs to be filled! <--- what??

 

Not only does our OT role need to be filled, we need BACK UPS for them as well.  Back ups can be found in later rounds, developmental projects. etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Williams' clock is about out. Can't say that about any other RB.

He is 31, expensive....and average.

Yeah this is true, but he's the most productive and most reliable  back we have right now. We'll see what the future holds, although I think that Williams and Stewart are both gone as soon as Gettleman can get rid of them without crippling the team.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A late round rooking runinng back is almost never immediately thrusted into starting position, and when he is he is almost never as productive as other more talented earlier picks. No one can say why he was drafted, because honestly it was dumb af considering we only have 2 tackles on our roster.  So people crack me up trying to logically reason out a move that reallly has no basis to have been made.  It was simply a dumb pick.

 

Agreed. The "Gettleman knows all" mentality has got to go. He's been here two years and he's done some pretty dumb sh*t, but people here act like he's some sort of messiah and he can do no wrong.

 

Sure, he's done some good things as well, but his best signing last year was Ted Ginn and he didn't even try to resign him. Same goes for some other key, instrumental players from last year.

 

And I don't care how people try to make sense of cutting Steve Smith, but it was an idiotic move unless something went down behind the scenes. People try to play the "Oh but we signed Jerricho Cotchery" schtick, but do they fail to realize that he's just as old, nearly just as expensive, yet less productive?

 

Gettleman has made some shitty moves, and drafting Star, which I'm sure Hurney and 31 other GMs in the league would've done in our position, does not automatically make the man a god.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You joke, but it can always be worse. He might walk with a limp or need assistance. Different sport, but Lonzo Ball couldn't even walk up steps a year after his injury.
    • I mean... a lot of the information that could've helped set better expectations has always been out there: There was no RB on the team under contract for the 2025 - 2026 season except for Miles Sanders. The team did not have a second round pick going into the 2025 season due to the trade for Young. Chuba's extension did not happen until the beginning of November. Jonathon Brooks was the clear RB1 in the class with a massive gap between RB1 & RB2. Example: Dane Brugler had Brooks as RB1, overall #48; Blake Corum was RB2, #81 overall. The Giants held pick #47 and had just lost Saquon Barkley to the Eagles in free agency. They were going to take Brooks had the Panthers not jumped in front of them. So if we're framing things with that context: Chuba was expected to be RB1 Miles (at the time) was RB2 Brooks was essentially RB3, stashed for rehab in 2024 with a long runway. The original injury occurred Nov 2023 while the re-injury occurred December 2024. That is right in the high-risk window for recurrence, especially in explosive athletes. The fact that it also happened on a non-contact play suggests possible biomechanical issues such as muscle imbalance, rather than a failed surgery (or bad decision-making).   NFL teams invest heavily in medically vetting prospects. If there had been a clear red flag in imaging or recovery markers, the team is going to find it. This sucks and the Panthers have sucked, yes, but this wasn't blind optimism or malpractice by the front office. It was a calculated decision based on the roster, draft capital, positional scarcity, etc.
    • Yep, but they can all rotate with Brown, Brown and Robinson (sounds like a law firm). Can't continue to have Derrick Brown out there for 90+ percent of the defensive snaps. An injury was bound to happen. 
×
×
  • Create New...