Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tats: sexy or no?


lola

Recommended Posts

I love tats on guys and think they look hot on girls too, in moderation of course. Do you guys think tats in general are trampy or does it just depend on what and where it is?

Edit: I already know what you think Biscuit :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tats are like Christmas lights in the yard. Too many and its busy and annoying. A few strategically placed and its all good. I dont like when people are literally going out of their way to wear something just so you see the ink. Seems self centered to me.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The person makes the tats. Not the other way around.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

 

This..granted I still don't care for them on females. My ex was infatuated with them and as soon as we broke up she probably went and added a couple more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's something about a woman with a half-sleeve that gets me every time.

I endorse this message. Also My ex had a big one from her hip bone all the way up her side that was hot. Any thing on the legs or lower back I'm not a fan of *** tats are trashy as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not gonna lie, that's hot.

 

Yeah it is.

 

I mean pstall is right... if a girl is hot, she's hot... but yes, in general tastefully done tats are very hot.  It adds a... mystique... idk.

 

Let me put it this way... nice tats can make an avg person 5-7, a 8-9...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lola has a point as well (went back and re-read)... type and placement is key...

 

Barbed wire on the bicep is pretty much analogous to an angel wing tramp stamp.

 

 

There's a chick in our gym...  thin, avg looking, nothing really special about her, but she has this tat on her leg that's like a tail that runs from under her shorts down the back of her leg... my god it's hot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, this year we should've easily been a playoff team in my opinion. We should have easily had two or three more wins--at least one--had not Bryce crapped the bed. But let's be serious about human nature and what we know about our FO. I wouldn't bet the farm that Bryce will be anything but the defacto starter in 2026, because (inconsistent though it was) we have exceeded expectations this year, and some in the FO probably believe, rightly or wrongly, that Bryce is at the center of that. You know, piece of bread seems like a meal if all you've had is a cracker. That being said, Bryce has shown plenty of inconsistency if not a downright pattern of flaws. He's a third year QB, and some, if not most, of his metrics aren't pretty. It could be argued that he should be further along (for me it's not really arguable). So, hopefully the decision makers will acquire a couple of plan Bs. I would hate it and love it if we identified "our guy" in the draft, and that it was somehow achievable to acquire him with a couple of high draft picks or even less. But we already pulled the trigger on Bryce with arguably awful results, so that's got to make the decision makers a little skittish to repeat a mistake that should be still fresh on everyone's mind. That being said, I think that it's more likely that we acquire a player like Mac Jones, Malik Willis or Trey Lance in free agency, and also target a day two or day three developmental pick in the draft with some real upside. That pick for would be Drew Allar who should slide to day three (I'm thinking). I think that this is more realistic than them releasing Bryce from his starter's role from the get-go, or someone just flat out playing themselves definitely into the starter's role by the time the season begins.  Now, again, if we can find "our guy" that changes the narrative and is expected to be the starter from day one, I'd be excited, if not downright ecstatic, but I don't think that's a realistic expectation.  Getting back to the team in general, If we don't make some improvements, including QB, I wouldn't bet that we'd necessarily be a playoff team next year, because, the rest of the NFCS is likely to improve next year. I don't expect that teams in our division will be necessarily able to "backdoor" themselves into the playoffs next season. So we're going to have to hit on at least a couple of picks, get healthy along the line, and fundamentally change the way we're calling plays because lightning probably isn't striking twice. I'm hoping that we'll have a real breakthrough season by 2028, because this season and next season aren't likely to be it because removing ball-and-chains ain't easy unless you got the key, and It's still gonna take some time to find it.
    • Necas is not the missing piece here.
×
×
  • Create New...