Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nate Chandler Future Left Tackle?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Maybe Chandler at LT and the big Canadian at Right? Still a long way to go until spots are settled and we'll see what the coaches think is the best combo from all of our tackles.

 

I doubt the canadian is an option at OT this season. Most people have said he is still pretty raw. Maybe next season more likely. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has a 1000% better attitude in his media quotes than Bell.

 

this reminded me..  somehow caught Hurney on the radio yesterday and he was speaking on Bell..   basically was talking about how Bell needs to learn he has the ability to succeed and has a tendency to be a perfectionist which affects him when things go bad.  Also mentioned how the death of his brother had an affect on this outlook.  That he tends to blame himself and questions whether he deserves success when things go bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have heard that Bell is trying to lose weight. If so, maybe that will help as well. I mean, if LT is his best position. We pretty much need to go in that direction. As long as he can beat out Chandler.

I know we want the best guy at LT. Cam's blind side is mucho importante. Part of me wants Bell to win, but Chandler is an intriguing candidate. So I kinda want him over there. I would prefer Chandler and his athleticism on the left side, and Bell just doesn't show that.

But that just puts Bell back at RT. Damm, I am just confusing myself now.

 

I am getting dizzy.  This is exactly how I feel.  I am all for giving Bell the shot on the left and see if being left handed pays off.  However, I am not too excited about him going back to the right.   Chandler seems like he could really take the LT spot.  We have other tackles on this team?  Any of them take RT and let Bell be Chandlers back-up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am getting dizzy.  This is exactly how I feel.  I am all for giving Bell the shot on the left and see if being left handed pays off.  However, I am not too excited about him going back to the right.   Chandler seems like he could really take the LT spot.  We have other tackles on this team?  Any of them take RT and let Bell be Chandlers back-up?

Yup, I wish there was a way that if Bell doesn't win the LT spot, he winds up being depth.

I just don't see that happening. He will be on the line somewhere. And to be honest, that does kinda scare me. Just a little, but still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this reminded me.. somehow caught Hurney on the radio yesterday and he was speaking on Bell.. basically was talking about how Bell needs to learn he has the ability to succeed and has a tendency to be a perfectionist which affects him when things go bad. Also mentioned how the death of his brother had an affect on this outlook. That he tends to blame himself and questions whether he deserves success when things go bad.

Wow.

I think that's a little too personal to be saying on the radio. We know the story already but damn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As of right now, Byron Bell is the coaching staff's favorite to be our LT.  I fear it doesn't matter how well Nate plays in the pre-season, Bell is probably going to be our starter for at least 4 weeks into the regular season no matter what. (It took an injury to Beason before the coaching staff finally placed Kuechly as our starting inside linebacker)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gronk is the best TE of all time, but he also played with Brady. Clarke was great, but had Peyton and in an era TE's didn't make crazy money. Kittle is great, but the two times he's made the SB, he was still on his rookie contract for one, and the other the 49ers had Purdy on a cheap rookie deal which help them build the rest of the roster. So again, it's not about not wanting an elite TE, of course it would be nice.  But realistically, in today's NFL, unless that elite TE with a top end TE salary is on a team with a GOAT level QB and/or other serious cap savings (i.e. key players on rookie deals), then I think it's not a good use of cap space.  
    • This place was the poo pre tepper with tons of hilarious posters like phillyB. Joined in the 2000s during the 07 season and have been here bitching about this team since. but yeah its sadly been dying a slow death, every time I come to this site I am surprised its still up. I think the 2015 season was the absolute peak, the Panthers and this board especially just haven't "felt" the same since then. Igo should really sell the board since he clearly doesn't care anymore. Also, Reddit blows and the Bryce defenders on there need Jesus.
    • Guessing the price is too rich here given the injury history.  2024 was brutal and production dropped off in 2025 with a few more injuries (albeit rough qb play).    Don’t really understand the narrative that Young can’t benefit from talented upgrades on offense. Especially here with respect to a tight end. Any QB will benefit from talented receivers that threaten the top of coverage and tight ends with skills to stress zone.    The age and injury history, coupled with what he’s likely asking, just probably means we can better spend that money elsewhere.
×
×
  • Create New...