Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Age vs Wear & Tear. This writer gives D-Lo the thumbs up.


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Ryan Allen of Cat Crave makes an interesting point in regards to Deangelo Williams as compared to other backs his age. He has had considerably less wear and tear than some backs in the league---a few his age---and this should translate into plenty being left D-Lo's tank.

 

This year, Carolina Panthers’ running back DeAngelo Williams will be entering his ninth season at the age of 31.  Many look no farther than his age before assuming that he can’t be any more than a situational back.  That couldn’t be farther from the truth as it pertains to DeAngelo Williams specifically.  He is not your typical 31-year-old tailback and he still has plenty to offer as a starter and playmaker.

 

 

 

He even backs up his assertion with a chart.

 

 

DeAngelo Williams                                   31                                                  1,370

Frank Gore                                               31                                                  2,187
Steven Jackson                                        30                                                  2,553
Adrian Peterson                                        29                                                  2,033
Maurice Jones-Drew                                 28                                                  1,804
Matt Forte                                                  28                                                  1,551
Marshawn Lynch                                       28                                                  1,753
Ray Rice                                                    27                                                  1,430
 
 
I know that I hadn't even really thought about D-Will from this perspective, as the 30-year-old-RB brick wall has been looming in the recesses of my mind.  But...just maybe...D-will can flout that supposed belief by continuing to offer game-breaking plays. And, yes, I said "continuing" because Williams still had a few of those last year, most notably his 72 yard reception-and-run against the Jets (though there are others, some of them here). I don't think that anyone can deny that Williams still had that extra gear in 2013, and if his body is any indication, there is no reason to think that he is ready to go to the scrapyard. He will never get that huge payday again because of the stigma of age (and will have to take a pay cut), but perhaps he can still offer that continued big play capability, if not just constant production for a few more years.
 
I hope that the O-line helps him out.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's probably something to this, and I expect it played a large role in Hurney's contract decisions. But Williams also had a lot more college carries than the other rb's on that list. (I'm assuming this because he was featured there for 4 years, but I haven't looked up the others.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not the carries, it's the quick twitch, the vision, and the speed in which the body heals.

 

RB's over 30 should be put out to pasture sooner rather than later.

 

It's easy to just say "it's not about the carries", but has that really been proven? D-Lo did not look like he was ready to be "put out to pasture" 6 months ago.  I can see arguing his cut-ability (pun not intended) due to finances and/or value, but he still flashed plenty of speed and showed great vision once he was able to clear the line. If he had had a better line, it is arguable that he is at least a top half RB in the league in 2013.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Backs that had one or more 1000 yd. seasons at 30 or over, from a 2010 Bleacherreport article:

 

Jim Brown
Marcus Allen
Warrick Dunn
Franco Harris
Ricky Watters
Fred Taylor
Curtis Martin
Thomas Jones
Tiki Barber
John Riggins
Tony Dorsett
Emmitt Smith
Barry Sanders
Walter Payton
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, I'm bored. So, here's a statistical comparison of these same players spanning NFL and college.

 

 

                                        AGE           PRO CARRIES         COLLEGE       TOTAL

DeAngelo Williams             31                    1,370                     969              2,339

Frank Gore                        31                    2,187                     348              2,535
Steven Jackson                  30                   2,553                      743             3,296
Adrian Peterson                 29                    2,033                     748              2,781
Maurice Jones-Drew          28                    1,804                     481              2,285
Matt Forte                          28                    1,551                     833              2,384
Marshawn Lynch                28                    1,753                     490              2,243
Ray Rice                             27                    1,430                     910             2,340
 
 
For what it's worth, I think Williams can be good this year (if the oline can block) just based on what I saw in some explosive plays last year.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's easy to just say "it's not about the carries", but has that really been proven? D-Lo did not look like he was ready to be "put out to pasture" 6 months ago.  I can see arguing his cut-ability (pun not intended) due to finances and/or value, but he still flashed plenty of speed and showed great vision once he was able to clear the line. If he had had a better line, it is arguable that he is at least a top half RB in the league in 2013.

 

You can't prove it's about carries or about age.  However, it's not hard to see that RB's over 30 don't fare that well in the pros.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you just watch the games you can see he is not anywhere near the same, that show numbers never lie is full of poo.

 

I think that saying that "he is not anywhere near the same" is just not taking the relative failure of the  O-line into account.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I feel like this trade just lives rent free in people's heads and keeps morphing into different things. First thing is that the rumored trade was for future firsts. They wouldn't have any extra picks in 2023; the firsts would have been for 2024 and 2025. With very few exceptions, NFL GMs don't value picks that far away. You have to have a lot of job security to pull that off. Like Chiefs, Eagles, Rams kinda stability. That's obviously not the case with David Tepper, especially since he'd just fired his head coach. No GM except for like Howie Roseman is going to trade an asset you have now for a future asset you probably get to use.  Second, at the time you'd have to assume these are first rounders late in the first round. Obviously currency is currency and the panthers need young players, but these weren't slam dunk top ten picks. At the end of the day there's one pick that separates a first and second round pick.  Lastly, the only place that ever reported this trade was the Rams. All the reporters just repeated what McVay said and it became gospel. We have no idea how serious the negotiations were, if they ever really happened, if the offer was real, etc. And I personally believe McVay and Sneed are the kind of guys who would make up rumors like that to fug up other teams, mostly because I assume if I've thought of it someone smarter than me has.  I don't know how you'd call it the greatest draft haul of all time. Firsts quickly lose their value the farther out they are and Burns had 16.5 sacks last season. And anyway those picks would probably just been tossed into the burning inferno of the Bryce trade up so it's a moot point anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...