Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Here is the thing about Belgium v. USA


Recommended Posts

Yet our Spec Ops use them lol

 

They're like Uzzi's.  Very convenient for close encounter gun fight because they light and pack many rounds.  But war?  No way.  If you try to use this gun to shoot from distance, you aint gonna hit poo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good luck guys. Will be a nice battle between two different styles of soccer. As someone mentioned, Belgium has one of the youngest squads of the WC, they however all have experience at the highest level, so I don't expect the stage to be too big for them.

I think it'll be a close game. We qualified with 3 wins, but the quality of the play hasn't been what they are capable of.

 

Oh and btw, half of Belgium speaks French, half Flemmish (Dutch-alike language), and we just kick ass at making beer. Cheers! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really makes me sick every time I see someone brag about the things our great grandparents accomplished in the 1940s. At some point we need to make our own legacy. We sound like idiots making World War II jokes. Calling the Germans Nazis in the lead up to that game was in poor taste too.

 

I know, internet, it's just a joke, etc. But at some point we have to draw a line between humor and stupidity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...