Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Here is the thing about Belgium v. USA


Recommended Posts

Yet our Spec Ops use them lol

 

They're like Uzzi's.  Very convenient for close encounter gun fight because they light and pack many rounds.  But war?  No way.  If you try to use this gun to shoot from distance, you aint gonna hit poo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good luck guys. Will be a nice battle between two different styles of soccer. As someone mentioned, Belgium has one of the youngest squads of the WC, they however all have experience at the highest level, so I don't expect the stage to be too big for them.

I think it'll be a close game. We qualified with 3 wins, but the quality of the play hasn't been what they are capable of.

 

Oh and btw, half of Belgium speaks French, half Flemmish (Dutch-alike language), and we just kick ass at making beer. Cheers! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really makes me sick every time I see someone brag about the things our great grandparents accomplished in the 1940s. At some point we need to make our own legacy. We sound like idiots making World War II jokes. Calling the Germans Nazis in the lead up to that game was in poor taste too.

 

I know, internet, it's just a joke, etc. But at some point we have to draw a line between humor and stupidity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He had a turnover on all three goals he was on the ice for. Plus he had that god awful delay of game penalty. Like legit his GS actually shows he was the cause of the loss and he was only on the ice for 12 minutes. You remove him from that game and the Canes win or at worst go to OT.  Let's put this in perspective, in 12 minutes he directly led to 3 goals against. In the 48 minutes without him on the ice it was an even-steven 2-2 game and that's disregarding that god awful delay of game penalty that led to goal number 4 of the 5 given up.      I don't see how anyone could say that he didn't directly lead to the loss.   
    • reality is the piling on of Frank Reich is just the standard huddle angle we take of putting all blame on someone after the fact.   as I was an OG Frank hater before it was cool to be......now the swing goes too far the other way and people will claim me is as a Frank defender.  Frank Reich was the definition of a .500 middle of the road NFL coach.  He technically was a winning coach and above .500 coming here but he is and was NFL average.  we were the biggest joke in a decade.....because they paired Frank Reich (a dude who was going to do what he does in the NFL) with a dude who couldn't do NFL basics and Frank was forced to play him.  That's not Frank being a loser.  That a bad org around Frank. 
    • Toronto is less physical than us, and they took them to 7  I really wish they would have won, because we match up better with them, but we have to deal with what we got  What worries me is Svech trying to take out Bob, that is desperation, that's what you do when you feel like there is no legit options left, it's what I feared, Bob is still in our core groups head, and they are over thinking, over passing Hopefully that changes tonight   
×
×
  • Create New...