Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deadpool


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

It was only 1 minute and 48 seconds, it was only computer-generated test footage, but it was definitely Deadpool — and it was definitely Ryan Reynolds' voice breaking the fourth wall.

Created some time ago by Culver City-based Blur Studios for 20th Century Fox, the clip leaked online curiously close to the end of Comic-Con

 

http://mashable.com/2014/07/29/deadpool-test-footage-leaked/

The high-res version has since been released(NSFW)

 

 

I imagine the positive reception is catching Fox studios attention..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been waiting on it forever. The R-rated requirement is all that is holding the movie up, but you kinda CAN'T have a Deadpool movie and have it be faithful to the character if it's not rated R. He's all about running off at his mouth (which includes f-bombs), killing copious amounts of people in a gruesome way, and the occasional hook up with big breasted women. You can't make it PG-13 and have it work well. It HAS to be R.

If Fox ever wakes up and realizes that they have to go with this, they'll be thankful. The way I look at it, Deadpool allows for a LOT. The Wolverine/Deadpool rivalry is amazing. Wolverine is already a BIG draw. Having Wolverine facing a mouthy, funny, arrogant, badass equal in a movie? Yes please. Deadpool time-traveling? Yes please. Expendables has 3 fuging movies now. Deadpool is basically part comic book movie, part Expendables-style shoot em up, blow em up, totally badass, macho movie. It WILL do well in the box office.


I just can't see how a Deadpool movie would fail. Casual, non-comic readers might find it weird (4th wall breaking and talking to himself/speech bubbles isn't very typical for movies), but comic movie fans will love it, action movie fans will love it, and at least some portion of the rest of movie-goers will love it. Do. The. Damn. Movie.


Oh, and one last tidbit. Fox is about to start a Fantastic Four found-footage style film. And in this movie, they are telling the actors not to read the comics, because they're doing a "re-imagining" of the Fantastic Four characters. That's right. ANOTHER poo Fantastic Four (probably the worst yet, on paper) and yet they REFUSE to pick up Deadpool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love it! They absolutely nailed the character, which I honestly never thought they would be able to do. The only thing I might tweak, is see if Ryan Reynolds can gritty up his voice a little more. His voice was described in the comics as "gravel and gasoline." So I always imagined him having a Nick Nolte-esque voice. Reynolds may need to reign in the clowniness a bit to capture his darker, borderline suicidal, sociopathic side.

 

I've always said if Fox had any concerns about this bombing, they should do a kick-starter. Nerds, myself included, would happily donate to get this fugger made. And made R-rated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would have to have a good writer/director. mixing r-rated comedy and action has been a challenge to Hollywood but I think now would be a good time to do it with so many comic films coming out a character like Deadpool would be a nice change of pace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reynolds has a history of being in bad comic films but then again so did Chris Evans before Captain America..

 

He did some pretty good work in a film about a guy buried alive too (I forget the title; it was something simple).

 

Deadpool is a role that plays perfectly to his strengths though.  Way better fit for him than Green Lantern.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Are you now equating best/worst rush defense with best/worst defense? Those are separate things entirely. For rush defense, depending on how you quantify it, he has been largely in the bottom third of the league his entire career as a defensive coordinator.  As you can see, aside from his one year in Denver, he has never been above 20th in yardage. Now, there is context to consider which is most coordinators choose to run on him(24th-32nd ranked in his three year in Carolina). So, if you just simply look at Y/A, it has been a relatively mixed bag. Twice a top 15 defense but twice a bottom 15 defense.  The thing the should make all this good/bad run defense a lot clearer is the right most columns. Evero's defense has always prioritized pass defense and confusing QB's. That's the core of his defensive philosophy, as has been reported relatively widely. As much as there are ample personnel issues on that side of the ball(many of which he contributes to with his below average talent evaluations) his defenses may never be truly elite in rush and pass defense unless they are stocked with defensive talent. Like....his Denver defense that he inherited was. To that point, if you look at all those rankings from the three years Fangio(of whom Evero is a noted disciple) it shows a progression of getting steadily better into the far more elite defense it is now under Vance Joseph. As far as his HC interest, recall that he was a hot commodity after Denver and that cooled significantly after his first two years here. I suppose if you count getting interviews for HC positions as a benchmark for being a good coach(most would not) then he is middle of the packish.
    • We are talking last week's playoff game, right? https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/202601100car.htm?hl=en-US#all_player_offense https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/gametracker/boxscore/NFL_20260110_LAR@CAR/?hl=en-US https://sportsdata.usatoday.com/football/nfl/stats/2879581?hl=en-US
×
×
  • Create New...