Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why *blank* Should Be Cut (Photoshop Challenge)


Dex

Recommended Posts

Ivan the Awesome came up with a thread a couple season ago to pick a player you felt was going to be cut and why. It was a glorious thread and there were plenty of lulz to go around not mention pie/swag. Now while my photoshop talents are lacking I'm sure there are some of you out there that are to the challenge. There is no prize. The only prize is pride, what else can you ask for? 

 

Also the photoshop title is still held by Catalyst or "Second City Panther" from the first thread.

 

9080304.jpg

 

 

That fuging delivered.

 

Anyway here are my sad attempts and I'm expecting great things from all of you.

 

16ishz9.jpg

 

It always seems like every time Barner gets the ball he gets thrown around like a fuging rag doll or a Super Smash Bros character near 200%. We have a deep RB core as of now especially with Stewart healthy and I like what I've seen out of Darrin Reaves. He doesn't seem to have any noticeable play making abilities and the staff can't trust him to return kicks or punts. I expect him to be in the last week of cuts.

 

345hkl3.jpg

 

Oh lawd this fuging guy. While the hair is sweet and I hear he's a good guy I can't see him making the team. He's like Tedd Ginn lite but can't catch. (can't believe I actually said that considering Ginn's hands) I see the team keeping 5 maybe 6 receivers and I'd say as of right now KB, Avant, JCo, Bersin, King and Philly are ahead of him. Perhaps he can show something tonight?

 

 

Have at it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...