Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Barber: Anderson Attended Production meeting


firstdayfan

Recommended Posts

Newton Plays. It's not like his ribs are going to heal over night.

 

Rivera, can't be that much of a wuss, can he??  It's a stress fracture/contusion, not an actual break.

 

I guess we'll see in about 7 hrs?

 

A lot of people drinking the DA kool aid I see?

 

Yes, he's a serviceable to very good back up. However, Pre-Season is preseason. And Newton, notoriously has played much better during the start of the REAL season than the preseason. And it's not liked he hasn't played with nagging injuries before. How soon to we forget.

 

Wouldn't feel too great with DA playing against that Defense in Tampa, during the first game of the season (regardless of what happened when the games didn't count), knowing the Panthers need a good start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lets say hypothetically derek anderson does start and absolutely lights up the tampa bay defense ... I'm talking about staggering numbers in the realm of like 375 yards passing, 5TD's, 0 INT's with kelvin benjamin having 175 of those yards and 3 tds.

 

Is there a QB controversy in Carolina?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think if Cam sits today he's going to be magically healed for next week.  I don't know what his pain level is, but could resting him today make his pain more manageable next week and make him more effective?  Hopefully his doctors are huddlers cause I don't know.  I would think the team is going to do what's best for the season.  If sitting him this week makes him a a little stronger and less likely for re-aggrivation, I'm fine with rolling for DA for one game.  I'd much rather see DA be the QB in a game where the opposing QB is Josh McCown.

I fully understand Cam is the best QB on this team, and there's no debate who our starting QB should be, but if DA is as bad as some have made him out to be, why is he on the team?  Isn't the whole point of having a backup QB is to have someone who can come in and at least still give you a chance to win?  I know DA's track record, but he is a former pro-bowler and I think we'll be ok in this game if he has to start.  Our defense can score points too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if DA is as bad as some have made him out to be, why is he on the team?

The same reason a lot of bad players are on teams. I mean, Curtis Painter and Jimmy Clausen are still floating around in the NFL. Not a lot of QBs to choose from.

Me personally I think we can win with Anderson, definitely. It just got tiring to hear everyone act like Tampa Bay is some run of the mill team that we will easily dispose of and we shouldn't be concerned about Anderson starting. I think he is capable, but Shula will need to establish a more balanced attack today. And that is what I'm afraid of. It feels like such a long time since we actually imposed our will in the run game on any team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Rotoworld:

Appearing on NFL GameDay First, NFL Network's Ian Rapoport reports coach Ron Rivera is considering holding Cam Newton (ribs) out of Sunday's Week 1 tilt with the Bucs.

Per Rapoport, Newton and his teammates are "optimistic" the quarterback will be able to play. But Rivera is concerned and may end up holding Cam out in an effort to have him healthy for the remainder of the season. The latter makes the most sense. Putting Newton out there against a physical Bucs defense and exposing him to big hits wouldn't be smart. Signs continue to point to Derek Anderson getting the nod under center come 4:25 PM ET.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...