Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Until found guilty by a jury of your peers.


heelinfine

Recommended Posts

Yes, Greg Hardy the person has that right to appeal and let it play out

People blur that with therefore there is no way he should face suspension. Which is false. The NFL can suspend you. They don't need a court of law to convict you of anything to do so

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Greg Hardy the person has that right.

People blur that with therefore there is no way he should face suspension. Which is false. The NFL can suspend you. They don't need a court of lapw to convict you of anything to do so

But don't you think, that as America's new favorite pastime, They should hold dear to those

tenants.

The only reason for rush to judgement, is the new media witch hunt. And myself for one, find that a little scary, and a lot sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But don't you think, that as America's new favorite pastime, They should hold dear to those

tenants.

The only reason for rush to judgement, is the new media witch hunt. And myself for one find that a little scary and a lot sad.

People get suspended all the time. Doctors, lawyers, teachers, whoever. They don't have to be convicted in a court of law either for it to happen.

If it was gonna happen it should of happened....but the news initially broke Jerry Richardson had every right to suspend Hardy if he saw fit. I thought he would have at the time

You see, one of the biggest issues in all of this mess this week is our society is trying to create different rules for guys that are good with a ball that are greatly different than the norm. I haven't got in that soapbox here but it is one of mine....we are seeing it trickle down to other levels of ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is sadder is a football player cold cocking the person he says he loves.

He is quite lucky that the woman didn't hit her head on that elevator railing or he would be looking at murder charge

Saddest of all is the woman married him which indicates to me that she does not think enough of herself to walk away

If history plays out the way it normally does, one day she won't walk away.

Take a real good look at her body language in their joint news conference, and if atter seeing that, you think this the first time it has happened, I'll sell you ocean front in Arizona

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok CRA, I respect you enough as a long time huddler as not to address you as D- Los biggest fan.

Suppose you were pulled over tonight, and law enforcement thought you were under the influence, but you knew that you were only sleepy , the breathalyzer was negative, but they still believe you were under the influence of something, so they took you in anyway. How would you feel if your employer, on that information alone suspended you for 6 weeks without pay?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it makes me very sad that things are this way in America right now. you dont punish someone until you know they are guilty. this is NOT like police brutality where the officer is suspended pending investigation. police officers are responsible for the protection of society, and to accuse one of assault is MUCH more serious than some crazy woman accusing an NFL player of roughing her up. The officer SHOULD be suspended for the safety of the community. The NFL player has no such responsibility to the community and therefore, ought not be punished until found guilty by a court of law according to a jury of his peers. Greg Hardy has not had the chance to exercise that right as of yet, so therefore, no action whatsoever should be taken against him until he is proven guilty by that jury of peers. 

 

its a closed case for me until the jury trial. i will be highly critical of the NFL if they suspend him and he is found innocent in the end. that would be unjust jeopardization of Hardy's livelihood and i would fully support him suing the NFL for as much as he could fuggin get. 

 

all that being said, domestic violence is a horrible terrible thing and i support the no-tolerance policy going forward. i am talking indefinite suspension immediately following the full due process of law, or following an admission of guilt (as in the Ray Rice case)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Greg Hardy the person has that right.

People blur that with therefore there is no way he should face suspension. Which is false. The NFL can suspend you. They don't need a court of law to convict you of anything to do so

 

They don't need it to suspend, however in cases like this, they usually wait and with good reason.  Unless there is clear cut guilt or some other circumstance, they usually wait.   If Hardy is found not guilty, he could have solid grounds for a lawsuit, especially if the suspension cost him money.  The NFL usually wins these lawsuits because they are smart about the suspensions.  But suspending a player who might be found not guilty is a little more risky. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce just didn't maximize Hunter Renfrow's skills. ***rant incoming*** But this isn't just about Bryce Young mistiming passes to Renfrow so bad that he's going to get Renfrow killed or hurt, this is also about incompetentence by Dave Canales. Renfrow can still play. He's putting DBs in a blender out there---making them play twister at the top of routes to keep up with him, and dumb Dave has the nerve to cut him. How about putting Hunter in the best position to help the damned offense by appreciating his skill set, DC? You're letting Bryce's apparent inability to make an accurate throw, or at least his timidity to push the ball down the damned field cloud your judgment and miscalculate talent---or maybe just miss on talent just as much as Bryce misses passes due to playing pussified football. It's fúcking unacceptable.  Speaking of misjudgment, I don't know if it's Dan Morgan or Canales, but Eijiro Evero is not the business at DC. I have said a few times that his scheme is not conducive to run-stopping efficiency. Hell, and after watching some clips of plays, now I absolutely know why. The gaps are at least half open before the play even fúcking starts. You are setting the opposition's RBs up for success with too much damned space at the line and in the second level. If our guys are taken out in these areas---at the line and in the second level---then the defense is screwed because it must rely on the safeties to cover too much ground to make the tackle. At least put Ransom in who is motivated to seek and destroy if you're going to effectively leave the safeties on an island.  And speaking of rookies, get our two new defensive ends more snaps to see if we can't generate more of a pass rush. For all the good the continued sorry display of defense that you're putting out for fan's to see (Ejiro, Dave and Dan), you may as well get the rookies generously involved. Fúck that money we gave second-rate (maybe second-rate) vets, we need a damned spark getting after the QB. Watch it, it's just another breakdown of the sh¡t we were subjected to last week. I say this with all respect: Fúck you, Dave! Fúck you, Dan! Learn how to run a fúcking franchise. Maximize the players, regardless of what you think you're supposed to do by the book. Cut the dead weight before another season is lost and fans lose interest in September. EE is "Ew!" Or for emphasis "EEw!" /end rant
    • But nobody is saying he is a good deep ball passer.  But the facts are since he's returned from his benching, he has been throwing downfield.  Whether you want to credit the scheme, Bryce himself, or whatever, he has been pushing it deep.  Not to any positive results mind you, but it has been happening.
×
×
  • Create New...