Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Quarterly stat projections at wide receiver show we're a better team than last year in spite of our weaknesses


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

…at least at that position. We've fallen off in other places obviously. But amidst the Steve Smith kerfluffle and the confluence of Dr. Doom posters co-authoring infallible predictions that the Panthers will gain exactly 6 yards from scrimmage on offense the next two years combined, projecting the first quarter of this season's receiving statistics suggests something quite different.

 

If, at the end of the year, the first four games prove to establish a mean of the entire season, here's what we'll look like at the end of the year:

  • Kelvin Benjamin ----- 84 rec, 1316 yds, 12 TD
  • Greg Olsen ----------- 84 rec, 1016 yds, 8 TD
  • Jerricho Cotchery -- 52 rec, 632 yds, 0 TD
  • Jason Avant --------- 40 rec, 360 yds, 4 TD
  • Philly Brown --------- 36 rec, 404 yds, 0 TD
  • Mike Tolbert --------- 32 rec, 236 yds, 0 TD
  • Jonathan Stewart --- 28 rec, 232 yds, 0 TD
  • Brenton Bersin ------ 12 rec, 196 yds, 0 TD
  • Darrin Reaves ------- 12 rec, 44 yds, 0 TD

That's a total of 4,436 yards receiving.

 

There are some obvious flaws in those extrapolations. Most likely, even if the distribution remains the same, Cotchery won't end the year with 0 TDs, and it's not terribly likely that Avant will end up with 4. Mike Tolbert will not get his full 236 yards receiving, and we'll likely see names pop up on this list that haven't caught a pass yet (some of Stewart's passes might go to Ed Dickson or Brandon Williams, or DeAngelo, who has yet to catch a pass out of the backfield.)

 

But here are five things that we can tell, provided, of course, these extrapolations (which come in spite of two very, very poor showings that comprise half our statistics, and in a time of the season when the Ron Rivera Panthers have proved to be slowest):

  • Cam Newton will throw for 4,055 yards, second-best personal record. Add in DA's touchdowns (a reasonable thing to do for the sake of analysis) and he's got 24 TDs and 0 INTs.
  • Kelvin Benjamin will win rookie of the year. 1300 yards and 12 TDs from a rookie. Cam will provably have his decade-long big motherfuger that we've all been pining here since he was sailing deep fades over Steve Smith's head a half dozen times every game.
  • Greg Olsen will break 1,000 yards receiving for the first time in his career. Even more importantly, this will mark the first time since Patrick Jeffers and Muhsin Mohammed were catching passes from Steve Beurlein back when Y2K fears were a thing that two Panthers receivers have eclipsed 1,000 yards.
  • Cam Newton will have totaled roughly 17,500 all-purpose yards in his first four years in Carolina, putting him half a season away from ousting Jake Delhomme as the franchise leader in that category.
  • giphy.gif

    giphy.gif

     

    giphy.gif

     

    JovialHospitableFinwhale.gif

 

 

TLDR: in spite of our massive flaws, we're setting up for a historically good Panthers season in many ways, led by our much-maligned receiving corps, who will post the team's best receiving year since Steve Smith was catching punts in college.

 

 

lol_bye_bitch.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This doesn't surprise me at all.  The people going crazy about the receivers should have saved it for the OL.

 

Let's hope the Panthers can turn this production into a few more wins in spite of the inability to run the ball or otherwise block anyone.

 

Great post bro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

worst o-line in the history of the NFL, two horrific, sphincter-clenching losses characterized by rutted playcalling, hobbled quarterback, decimation at tailback… and we're still on track to give cam the 2nd-best season of his career passing, by far the best in efficiency, and post all-time high receiving stats for the receivers (as a position group [including olsen] they'll outdo the 99 squad.)

 

given this i can't fathom not being incredibly pumped to go pummel the bears on sunday. i think we can do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

worst o-line in the history of the NFL, two horrific, sphincter-clenching losses characterized by rutted playcalling, hobbled quarterback, decimation at tailback… and we're still on track to give cam the 2nd-best season of his career passing, by far the best in efficiency, and post all-time high receiving stats for the receivers (as a position group [including olsen] they'll outdo the 99 squad.)

 

given this i can't fathom not being incredibly pumped to go pummel the bears on sunday. i think we can do it.

 

I can't imagine what this forum will be like if we don't :unsure:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stats are fun and cam is killing it in the pocket. But we need Tds. Especially in the red zone.

The defense is an enigma and will dictate what we should do on offense. If were stopping them on defense I have no problem with clock control. If their offense is beating us we have to open it up with the passing game. Because scrub Rbs and poo run blocking ain't gonna cut it.

Mike Shula for as much as I've supported him called probably his worst game this past Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stats are fun and cam is killing it in the pocket. But we need Tds. Especially in the red zone.

The defense is an enigma and will dictate what we should do on offense. If were stopping them on defense I have no problem with clock control. If their offense is beating us we have to open it up with the passing game. Because scrub Rbs and poo run blocking ain't gonna cut it.

Mike Shula for as much as I've supported him called probably his worst game this past Sunday.

 

agreed on all counts. for that kind of yardage and our abysmal run game (we have one touchdown on the ground, right?) 24 TDs passing isn't going to cut it.

 

IMO red zone playcalling is where we can improve the most. shula calls a decent game between the 20s and the moment we get into scoring range he seems to poo his pants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...