Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Harper talks about Kuechly


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

From Jones in the Observer (link)

 

“I’ve been on the other side when Luke had 20-some tackles, and I blamed the rain for that,” said Harper, who was with the Saints last year when Kuechly had 24 tackles in the Week 16 win last season. “But now I know that’s just who this guy is, and I tip my hat to him. I just gave him a big hug and I said, ‘Man, I appreciate you.’

“And the fact that he continues to lead us and never bats an eye, never points fingers, always positive and just flies around and makes plays. I understand all the ‘Luke’ chants in the crowd.”

The change of perspective amuses me.

 

Also, from the 'quick hits' at the end of the article...

 

In the second half, the referee kept his mic on during a dead ball. “Hey, this has turned into a pretty good football game,” he told another official.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol, that is seriously great commentary by the refs. Why Harper amuses you I'm not sure. He spoke the truth, many guys would kiss ass to the question and not answer honestly.

 

He's talking about last year's second Saints-Panthers game.

 

How do you attribute Luke's performance in that game to "the rain"? :lol:

 

(Milli Vanilli reference incoming shortly)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting quote by Newton at the end. Subtle shot at Shula and forcing the running game?

“We’re getting there. What can’t happen is we feel pressured or hear whispers about running the football.” – Newton.

I may be mistaken, but I believe he was asked about his lack of

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may be mistaken, but I believe he was asked about his lack of rushes and he was saying he can't listen to what people are saying and start forcing it. Don't think he was talking about Shula or even the RBs at all but rather his run game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may be mistaken, but I believe he was asked about his lack of rushes and he was saying he can't listen to what people are saying and start forcing it. Don't think he was talking about Shula or even the RBs at all but rather his run game.

Ahh. I haven't watched the post game interviews so the quote in the article is without any context.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not as good as the Patriots game.

IMO yes it was. Stakes were higher, rain was awesome, crowd was awesome, awesome game winning drive, Luke was awesome...

I have personal reasons as well, my mom died the next morning (not to be Debbie Downer) and that stadium was as loud as it has ever been

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not as good as the Patriots game. 

 

 

Having been at both games, I can't day one was better than the other...both were exciting...and awesome.  The rain game had that unique element with the monsoon....and the rain getting big cheers the harder it got.  NE was MNF.  Both were great.  Period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
    • Supplemental draft uses picks from next year. So a team were to draft him in the 1st, their upcoming 1st next draft would no longer be available. There have been some notable players that were obtained in the supplemental draft, such as Kosar. It doesn't necessarily happen every year either, and is more on a as needed basis. The gambling trouble is a big red flag for teams, and maybe pushes him down to a 4th? Not sure a team would use a 1st on him.
×
×
  • Create New...