Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question for couch coordinators...


Towelboy

Recommended Posts

Is there an offensive philosophy that works with our current roster? We do not appear to be signing new offensive weapons, so what can we do with the roster we have?  

 

What would you do? Overload one side and have Cam roll the other way? No-huddle hurry-up? Quick outs and drag routes? If you were given this roster, what kind of play calling are you installing in your base offense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there an offensive philosophy that works with our current roster? We do not appear to be signing new offensive weapons, so what can we do with the roster we have?  

 

What would you do? Overload one side and have Cam roll the other way? No-huddle hurry-up? Quick outs and drag routes? If you were given this roster, what kind of play calling are you installing in your base offense?

 

 

You are asking for two different things.

 

 

We are set up to run a Coryell, that's what we will need to continue to run.  The issue is we have too much money tied up in RB's (stupid all the time) and not enough in the O Line (stupid almost all the time).  

 

 

Coryell is based on a power running game, and we don't have the ability to have one right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to be honest, I had to look up the Coryell Offense. According to wikipedia:

"Overall the goal of the Coryell offense is to have at least two downfield, fast wide receivers who adjust to the deep pass very well, combined with a sturdy pocket quarterback with a strong arm. The Coryell offense uses three key weapons. The first is a strong inside running game, the second is its ability to strike deep with two or more receivers on any play, and the third is to not only use those two attacks in cooperation with each other, but to include a great deal of mid-range passing to a TE, WR, or back."

If that is the case, it isn't just our poor protection and running game, but lack of FAST WRs that is holding us back also.

 

If we can't establish the run, what would you do to move the ball? Allow Cam to do it all? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to be honest, I had to look up the Coryell Offense. According to wikipedia:

"Overall the goal of the Coryell offense is to have at least two downfield, fast wide receivers who adjust to the deep pass very well, combined with a sturdy pocket quarterback with a strong arm. The Coryell offense uses three key weapons. The first is a strong inside running game, the second is its ability to strike deep with two or more receivers on any play, and the third is to not only use those two attacks in cooperation with each other, but to include a great deal of mid-range passing to a TE, WR, or back."

If that is the case, it isn't just our poor protection and running game, but lack of FAST WRs that is holding us back also.

 

If we can't establish the run, what would you do to move the ball? Allow Cam to do it all? 

 

Well the only problem there is that we have A.) No run game and B.) Not even one fast receiver

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, we're nowhere near having an offensive identity other than "hope Cam bails us out on 3rd and long".

If I'm installing a new offense, I'd go for a zone stretch offense. Let the offensive linemen block down instead of trying to manhandle their opponent, and give Cam space to make plays out of the bootleg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no runs up the middle on first down, our backs are more off tackle types.  more swing passes if the defense is playing off.  but none of that matters if the players fail to execute.  i think there have been some good play designs the last couple of years, but the fact of the matter is the line sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a flea-flicker to the slowest WR in the NFL.

 

The read option is very important. Designed runs for Cam. We're limited in what we can do due to a lack of offensive talent. I would lean on Cam, but that's going to put him at increased risk on injury.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that we already went into depth with this topic a few weeks ago. I want us to run the Air Coryell, because I think it would best fit Cam. However, obviously we lack an O-line. That's the thing, you really can't run any offensive system because we have the worst O-line in the NFL. You can't run smash mouth, you can't run a vertical offense, you can't run a coryell offense, etc.

 

That's another thing though. We don't have an identity on offense so we can't build on anything and get better at a system. Shula tries to throw in a little bit of everything and it doesn't work that way. We need a definite offensive system that we can build around so our players can get familiar with it. But, it doesn't really matter anyway if our defense keeps allowing 37+ points. It's all a mess man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there an offensive philosophy that works with our current roster? We do not appear to be signing new offensive weapons, so what can we do with the roster we have?

What would you do? Overload one side and have Cam roll the other way? No-huddle hurry-up? Quick outs and drag routes? If you were given this roster, what kind of play calling are you installing in your base offense?

Only two things works. Elite D. More elite than ours last season paired with our current O or

It is called....Cam save us and try to be a one man wrecking crew. This also requires prayer too.

There is no magic formula where you add bad OL play, no traditional rush attack, and no WRs to stretch the field that = successful offense.

Cam dropping back every play and pulling off magic is our only shot if our D is gonna be giving up 30

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...