Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Norwell video


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

" width="600" height="600" frameborder="0">

 

Sorry for the crappy quality... but watch Norwell. Finishes his man, then takes on Foucault's man preventing a sack.

 

 

 

When have you ever seen Amini do that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't believe this kid didn't get a chance sooner. If there's any take away from the OL dumpster fire, we may have found a new guard 

 

I am concerned that RR plays favorites and is not a good evaluator of talent.  The way he promoted Bell and Chandler, for example, is one reason Gettlemen went G instead of T in the draft.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks to me like that's by design.  You see Kalil shade the inside shoulder so Norwell can take the center/right and help out Foucault.  It's like a moving wall with parts that shift towards where the defensive linemen are going.

 

Chandler handles his man one on one very well.  Fernando gets pushing right into Cam's lap.

 

All that being said I really love Norwell and do think he and Turner are our best guards and bode well for the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am concerned that RR plays favorites and is not a good evaluator of talent.  The way he promoted Bell and Chandler, for example, is one reason Gettlemen went G instead of T in the draft.

 

Where did you hear that?  One could have argued that we needed guards as badly if not worse than the tackle spot.  Turner was a great pick and it's much easier to find quality guards than tackles.  G-man did say that after the top 3-4 tackles there was no one that was better than what was already on our roster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's not wrong though. You talk like a politician on here. Leaving yourself just enough wiggle room to say you never fully counted Bryce out if you need to....But we can all see it. Just say you think he is a bust outright and you will have to type a lot less. Obfuscating your opinion behind QB3 competitions etc....
    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
×
×
  • Create New...