Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers believe Hardy innocent, will try to workout extension


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

fuggin yes, hopefully Greg isn't too jaded from this crap

 

edit - if/when he is found innocent and we sign him long term, does anyone think we should get some kind of considerations from the NFL?  I would suggest cap relief or extra draft picks (compensatory type) if that's a possibility with the CBA.  It seems, however, this is all being made up on the fly, so perhaps Goodell can act unilaterally and do the Panthers a solid before he's run out of town when Ray Rice wins his appeal, suits back up, and this ishstorm starts again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to go into the Tinderbox to run this theory by venom and see what he thinks;

But what if the Panthers paid Nicole Holder for this whole fiasco to drop Greg's asking price down on a long term deal, knowing they'd never be able to afford him without such a bizarre occurrence happening?

#gettlevoodoo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we are having this dance again.  Had we let Hardy walk like we should have, we could have signed a LT, re-signed Mitchell to play with DeCoud, maybe signed a receiver worth his salt, and who knows else.  Now we want to throw some more cash towards Hardy, and have Bell at LT for another 10 years.  Sounds like a well thought out plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...