Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

signs that point to us beating ATL on Sunday


gettlemanjack

Recommended Posts

Post 'em if you got 'em

Falcons are 1-5 on the road (beat Tampa 27-17, lost to Bengals, Vikings, Giants, Ravens, Lions).

of mutual opponents, three games point to us being the better team:

at Cincinnati

-ATL lost 10-24

-CAR tied 37-37

Lions (CAR at home, ATL in London)

-CAR won 24-7

-ATL lost 21-22

Bears at home

-CAR won 31-24

-ATL lost 13-27

one game points to ATL being the better team:

Saints at home

-ATL won in OT 37-34

-CAR lost 10-28

two games point to us being even:

Bucs away

-ATL won 27-17

-CAR won 20-14 without Cam

at Baltimore

-CAR lost 10-38

-ATL lost 7-29

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neil Greenberg of the Washington Post makes NFL game predictions based on a multitude of factors that will have an impact on game day. These include efficiency stats such as success rates, yards per play and yards allowed per play, plus points scored based on strength of opponent.

Pick: Carolina Panthers

Win probability: Carolina Panthers 62.4 percent

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fancy-stats/wp/2014/11/13/week-11-nfl-picks-patriots-and-seahawks-are-this-weeks-best-bets/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me, it's pretty disheartening that we're even talking about losing to such a dumpster fire of a team, but we are a dumpster fire ourselves. What do you get when two dumpster fires come together?

You can call this the Dumpster Fire Bowl

Dumpster Infernobowl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...