Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jason Avant Cut


UNCrules2187

Recommended Posts

I highly doubt Avant was the only player on the team, and particularly the offense, who felt that way.

 

Rivera has been blaming the players for his own incompetence for too long.

 

Watch Greg Olsen's face when he gives interviews.

 

It's the classic face of a guy biting his tongue.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think they ever actually believed in King and McNutt that much.

Per Voth, they knew early on that they weren't going to be able to pay what the best receivers wanted, so they'd have to go with role players. And that approach is fine, if you use them like role players.

They didn't.

Yet another Rivera lie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Separate the fact that we agree with Avant's comments and a player trashing his coach. Just because Avant was right doesn't mean it's ok.

A vet Avant answering a simple question professionally .....doesn't exactly make him wrong him either.

It does highlight Rivera's weakness as a HC. But really it could simply be more of a Ron issue than Avant being wrong

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watch Greg Olsen's face when he gives interviews.

 

It's the classic face of a guy biting his tongue.

 

 

Yeah I agree, he doesn't have to say it. Though, if things keep getting uglier, him and others may eventually speak out.

 

It will be interesting to see how the team responds after this move and Rivera's decision at the end of the game this past Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A vet Avant answering a simple question professionally .....doesn't exactly make him wrong him either.

It does highlight Rivera's weakness as a HC. But really it could simply be more of a Ron issue than Avant being wrong

 

 

I understand what you're saying - most people here are agreeing with you. I personally think answering a question that calls out your coach/boss is unprofessional - no matter the manner in which is was delivered. I'm sure he's not the only one feeling the frustration but he's the only one pointing fingers. Zod's made it pretty clear that Olsen has to bite his tongue when he was responding to questions. If I (politely) pointed fingers at my boss I would expect repercussions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watch Greg Olsen's face when he gives interviews.

It's the classic face of a guy biting his tongue.

Mentioned this earlier in this thread.

Go watch his interview from Monday if you already haven't. His tone completely changed when asked about the play calling and it was pretty obvious he was doing his best to hold back his true feelings

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Avant already got cut last year for speaking out of turn, not sure why this is so surprising and upsetting to some of you.

 

He wasn't fast, had drops, so-so blocker, no special teams and publicly called out a coach on the hottest of hot seats after a home divisional loss to a team we should have steam-rolled.

 

The only thing disappointing about this is a team with solid leadership would have pulled the trigger Monday.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because something is the truth, does not mean that you can always be free to spout it.

 

"Damn woman, your azz looks 3 feet wide in that dress"  for instance.

 

Coaches cannot get in front of the microphone and say:

 

"Cam really sucked today, he overthrew like every other throw, no way we can win like that"

"We are really in a bind because of the money situation, we have 2 guys at OT that are waaaaaay over their head and we know it"

"We hate having Hardy on the exempt list, because the rest of the DE's just don't seem to be able to get any pressure at all"

"We might have a better running game, but the guys on our team making all the money, can't seem to avoid injuries cause they aren't getting any younger"

 

See, coaches cannot do that, you cannot say something just because you feel it the truth and players aren't exempt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I agree, he doesn't have to say it. Though, if things keep getting uglier, him and others may eventually speak out.

 

It will be interesting to see how the team responds after this move and Rivera's decision at the end of the game this past Sunday.

 

 

Yeah I'm really curious too. I wonder how the bye week will impact it as well. Seems like they could easily say "fug it" after getting to sit at home for a week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because something is the truth, does not mean that you can always be free to spout it.

"Damn woman, your azz looks 3 feet wide in that dress" for instance.

Coaches cannot get in front of the microphone and say:

"Cam really sucked today, he overthrew like every other throw, no way we can win like that"

"We are really in a bind because of the money situation, we have 2 guys at OT that are waaaaaay over their head and we know it"

"We hate having Hardy on the exempt list, because the rest of the DE's just don't seem to be able to get any pressure at all"

"We might have a better running game, but the guys on our team making all the money, can't seem to avoid injuries cause they aren't getting any younger"

See, coaches cannot do that, you cannot say something just because you feel it the truth and players aren't exempt.

lol gruden did
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand what you're saying - most people here are agreeing with you. I personally think answering a question that calls out your coach/boss is unprofessional - no matter the manner in which is was delivered. I'm sure he's not the only one feeling the frustration but he's the only one pointing fingers. Zod's made it pretty clear that Olsen has to bite his tongue when he was responding to questions. If I (politely) pointed fingers at my boss I would expect repercussions. 

Yeah.

 

He also could have found a better way to say it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's funny how the teams with the great QBs stay at or near the top of the league every season.  Yes it is a team game, but the QB has the biggest impact in most NFL football games. 
    • Look, no one is ever a perfect player.  Since the QB handles the ball on 100% of plays offensively (unless there's a direct snap to a RB or something), I can absolutely see where they get an outsized blame and gain from what happens at any given snap of a football game.   Theoretically, there shouldn't even be a stat or idea to a 4th quarter comeback or game winning drive because you should already have done that during the game.  Losers!  Right?  Just because you win late doesn't take away the fact you tried to lose the game for your team! I'm not a fan of that opinion, but again, I'm just a moron with a keyboard.   Bryce has limited tools.  Bryce has not inspired the same level of confidence in us as Cam Newton did in year 3.  I certainly get that.  We traded a TON of assets to get Bryce, and we still suck.  (I mean, since we've lost games, we're losers right?) I completely understand that some fans are just unhappy with a limited QB and a team that isn't performing well, unless the other teams are worse losers than we are. I will say this:  Bryce will fight until the end.  Sure, he's has some real loser football.   But in close games, he's doing his best to comeback (even against a winner of prevent D). Now is it better or worse if your QB plays their best ball in the first half and sucks 2nd half so long as they finish with 300 yards, 3 TDs for your fantasy points? Who said stats are for winners anyway?  The Panthers and Bryce has a long way to go.  I'm enjoying the winning right now.  Though I do start each game thinking "how will we fug this up today?" Because it's been such a poo show in the Tepper era.  Will he prove to be a legit starting NFL QB?  Maybe not here as evidence by our record with QBs who were high draft picks.  
    • Ive never liked the term game winning drives because they include games where the QB was part of or was the reason the team was behind in the first place. Ive been arguing against this stat since the Delhomme years. It should only count when the QB is out of the equation of reasons why the team fell behind in the first place and is at least half the reason why he led the last drive to give them a lead. It shouldnt count if they just hand it off most of the time and the RB is on fire and they go down and score a TD or FG.
×
×
  • Create New...