Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Couple things on the Stew fumble play.....


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

" width="600" height="600" frameborder="0">

 

 

1. Bell failed to seal his block. Stew didn't have much of a chance.

 

 

2. Good lesson for Philly Brown. Philly turns his back on the play before its even over, never sees the fumble occur when he would have been in perfect position to recover.

 

The defensive coaches preach playing until the whistle. Seems like a little of that coaching needs to happen on the offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Bell failed to seal his block. Stew didn't have much of a chance.

2. Good lesson for Philly Brown. Philly turns his back on the play before its even over, never sees the fumble occur when he would have been in perfect position to recover.

The defensive coaches preach playing until the whistle. Seems like a little of that coaching needs to happen on the offense.

I knew you were gonna somehow blame Shula.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh wow, come on Philly... I wonder if Ron has seen and noticed this and will do something about it.... Probably not.

 

 Ron liked the hustle he saw out there.  Said DWill wouldn't have fumbled.  He pointed out that Bell did his job and did it at a high level but both the RB and the TE failed to do the basics and really should thank Bell for being there.  His final thought on the fumble was that you just have to understand that its a process and sometimes a fumble is not a bad play.  The defense had great field position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't say Bell did not seal his block. He blocking looked consistent with an inside run so unless we know that was what was NOT called, you can't blame him.

The obvious thing is Brown. Hopefully he learns from this.

 

Think you absolutely can say that Bell didn't seal that edge, the initial defensive contact was made by his defensive end, (#86?) which meant Stewart was turned and was carrying less momentum into his original tackler. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like the whole blocking scheme broke down, and the fact that Philly didn't engage in a block on one of the outside guys makes me wonder if the play was a possible smoke screen out the left and DA opted for the handoff.  The play was essentially blown up by the outside defenders coming up to stuff the corner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think you absolutely can say that Bell didn't seal that edge, the initial defensive contact was made by his defensive end, (#86?) which meant Stewart was turned and was carrying less momentum into his original tackler.

Yes you can say that and you'll be correct but that'll be being simplistic. Try understanding what I wrote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this was dwill he would be getting crucified over this. Yet stewy fumbled twice and the excuse are here. Hm......

 

It is pretty clear the problem here....

 

The saints game was a clear fluke for our running game. We still lack the right pieces. Neither running back is ideal anymore and still too many problems on the oline, rookies, bell. The play calling could also improve, but also we have DA, so the Cam threat isn't real anymore which is a rather big deal for our run game.

 

You can't say Bell did not seal his block. He blocking looked consistent with an inside run so unless we know that was what was NOT called, you can't blame him.

The obvious thing is Brown. Hopefully he learns from this.

 

What difference does it make? If Byron was worth a spill of beans he would have bulldozed that guy into next year, but when does that ever happen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this was dwill he would be getting crucified over this. Yet stewy fumbled twice and the excuse are here. Hm......

It is pretty clear the problem here....

The saints game was a clear fluke for our running game. We still lack the right pieces. Neither running back is ideal anymore and still too many problems on the oline, rookies, bell. The play calling could also improve, but also we have DA, so the Cam threat isn't real anymore which is a rather big deal for our run game.

What difference does it make? If Byron was worth a spill of beans he would have bulldozed that guy into next year, but when does that ever happen?

Why Bell alone? Which of the linemen are bulldozing anyone? See the guy who recovered the fumble? That was Kalil's block.

Maybe if Kalil was worth a spill of beans, he will hold his block long enough for a panther to recover the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...