Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Richard Sherman talks about Cam Newton


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

From the Observer's "Inside the Panthers" section (link)

 

After the Seahawks' 31-17 win Saturday, Sherman crowed a bit to NFL Network, saying he should have had two or three picks. He also brought up Newton's comments.

"I didn't think he'd throw that go ball, but obviously he decided to make that decision," Sherman told the network. "I heard earlier in the week he was going to try me. He didn't care what side he threw it to, and you've got to make him pay for those bad decisions."

The pick by Sherman proved to be the least costly of Newton's three turnovers. It was basically a punt and led to no Seattle points.

 

Anytime you're reading comments from Sherman, you have to separate what's actual analysis from what's just his ego talking.  I'd say his comments here fall under the latter, with the 'bad decision' in this case being the one to throw to his side of the field.

 

You can watch the whole interview here.

 

Other excerpts...

 

There was confusion during and after the game about how defensive end Michael Bennett came through the left side of the line unblocked to disrupt the play. Newton indicated the crowd noise prevented all the linemen from getting the call.

"That was a read play. I don't think it was blocked right, but that's what happens when you play in a hostile environment," Newton said. "A lot of people heard one thing, and others heard something else."

 

Newton's worst giveaway was his last one: Kam Chancellor's pick-six in the fourth quarter that sealed it for the Seahawks.

That play was designed to go away from Sherman's side. But first-year receiver Brenton Bersin, the first read, slipped in his route.

Panthers coach Ron Rivera said Newton was a little late coming back to the right side, allowing Chancellor to break in front of tight end Ed Dickson and deliver the dagger.

"The difference was just missed opportunities," Newton said. "I did a bad job of protecting the football, and when you're playing a great defense you just have to take what they give you."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ron Rivera said no one was supposed to block the defensive end and the mixup was between Cam and Stewart. If you watch the play and see what happened it's fascinating. It's possible Cam made a change at the line of scrimmage for Bell to block the end because the Panthers had numbers to the right side. However the play was not designed that way and we can speculate Bell didn't hear any adjustment that may have occurred

 

The first interception was not a big deal to me. It was a low risk, high reward play. Cam was kind of throwing on the run and late and it happened but it wasn't any worse than a punt. I saw Sherman's interview live and he was not derogatory of Cam. He was talking in a calm "cheeky" tone. Sure his line was self serving but not really mean spirited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ron Rivera said no one was supposed to block the defensive end and the mixup was between Cam and Stewart. If you watch the play and see what happened it's fascinating. It's possible Cam made a change at the line of scrimmage for Bell to block the end because the Panthers had numbers to the right side. However the play was not designed that way and we can speculate Bell didn't hear any adjustment that may have occurred

 

The first interception was not a big deal to me. It was a low risk, high reward play. Cam was kind of throwing on the run and late and it happened but it wasn't any worse than a punt. I saw Sherman's interview live and he was not derogatory of Cam. He was talking in a calm "cheeky" tone. Sure his line was self serving but not really mean spirited.

 

To be fair, when is Sherman not self-serving?

 

Love him or hate him, it's hard to deny the dude thinks an awful lot of himself.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ron Rivera said no one was supposed to block the defensive end and the mixup was between Cam and Stewart. If you watch the play and see what happened it's fascinating. It's possible Cam made a change at the line of scrimmage for Bell to block the end because the Panthers had numbers to the right side. However the play was not designed that way and we can speculate Bell didn't hear any adjustment that may have occurred

 

The first interception was not a big deal to me. It was a low risk, high reward play. Cam was kind of throwing on the run and late and it happened but it wasn't any worse than a punt. I saw Sherman's interview live and he was not derogatory of Cam. He was talking in a calm "cheeky" tone. Sure his line was self serving but not really mean spirited.

 

So not only are Bell's feet filled with sand but he is also deaf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The good thing about replacing a bad player is you really have nothing to lose. If their replacement is bad so what, you didn't get much worse and probably saved money.  
    • I came over from the old Panthers Insider site. When Fox Sports bought that platform it slowly just started dying plus the guy who ran that site was dealing with some pretty significant health issues so the whole thing just slowly fell apart. Quite a few of us migrated over here. Not sure how many are still around.  I miss that place. It struck a nice balance of having enough active posters to keep productive conversation flowing but didn't have so much traffic that you end up with a lot of trolling BS. This place is getting there though since we shutdown new registrations but at some point we're going to have to open it back up or we'll watch this place slowly die off too as posters fall off for one reason or another. We just have to figure out a way to filter out the spam bots. It was a never ending battle to ban the spam bots to keep then from overrunning the site. You'd think they'd be a little more strategic. I mean, if you fill a site with nothing but spam people are just going to stop coming so it's not a sustainable model. But nope, every one of them makes dozens of duplicate threads filling up pages upon pages as soon as their account goes live.
    • lol...I don't remember that.  Although recalling what I had for breakfast yesterday is sometimes a challenge.  Hope it was a positive thing.
×
×
  • Create New...