Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does Dave have any say in the Coaching staff?


London Loves Luke

Recommended Posts

That is the way it should be. Even if I disagree with Rivera's assessment and decisions, you want to really fug up a franchise have the FO make assistant decisions

 

If Harbaugh could get released for not replacing greg roman. I don't see why Rivera can't get told to either replace shula and dorsey or get gone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Harbaugh could get released for not replacing greg roman. I don't see why Rivera can't get told to either replace shula and dorsey or get gone.

Should be interesting to see how that works out for SF

I am more of a guy that thinks head coaches should control hiring firing assistants and GM hires or fires head coaches.

Nothing worse than FO meddling on coaching

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is the way it should be. Even if I disagree with Rivera's assessment and decisions, you want to really fug up a franchise have the FO make assistant decisions

 

In certain cases when the assistant coaches is garbage, YES

 

Any good GM can see Shula & Rodgers are not the answer. Tell the HC you're not satisfied with what you're seeing. HC disagree, so you go to ownership. I really don't care for Rivera, he's not the answer either. I don't mind having another 49ers situation here in carolina like harbaugh and greg roman 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He technically has the power, but like most GMs he leaves the coaching hires and fires to the head coach's discretion.

 

My question would be how strongly he'd be willing to "suggest" some things.

Hope it's like...

DG: "Hey Ron, you let go of Shula or I let go of you"

RR: "Uh Shula can I speak to you for a moment?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What Gettlemen is doing is allowing Ron to choose his staff, as he should, and allowing Ron to succeed or fail by his own choices. Sure Gettlemen will make suggestions when asked but he's smart to let Ron sink or swim by Rons own decisions. If Ron fails then Gettlemen will clean house after this season and start over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Canales’ recipe for success is simple — slow the game down with long drives that keep the other team’s offense off the field. Long drives are built from short gains but short gains require more 3rd-down conversions.  The Panthers are converting 37.5% of their third downs, which is average but not enough. As a result, they have attempted 21 fourth downs — the most in the NFL — and they’ve converted 71.4% of them, ranking 3rd among teams with at least 15 attempts. The Chiefs are second @ 80% and the Colts are first at 88% but the majority of their conversions are short yardage runs - not passes.  The Panthers have had three big wins this season — against Miami, the Cowboys, and the Packers — those conversions have played a major role in each of those wins. Miami The Panthers trailed by 17 in the 2nd quarter, facing a 4th-and-5 at the Miami 48. Young threw a 21-yard completion and they went on to score 7 on that drive. Then in the 4th, down by 4, they faced another 4th-and-5 at the Miami 33. Young delivered a 17-yard completion for the 1st down and they went on to score the winning TD. Cowboys The game is tied and the Panthers take over at their own 14 with 6 minutes left. Rico picks up 16 yards and Young converts two 3rd downs, gaining 37 yards, but misses on a third conversion. At the Cowboys’ 40, facing a 4th-and-4 at the 2-minute mark — knowing the Cowboys likely score if they get the ball back — Canales has them go for it. Young converts with a 7-yard pass putting them at the 33 in FG range. They then go on to kicj the game winning FG. Packers Young was 2-for-2 on 4th-down attempts. Then on the final drive starting from their own 19 with the score tied, Young converts two 3rd downs for 19 yards and Rico adds another 19 to move them into field-goal range for the win. In total, Bryce went 2-for-4 on 3rd downs and 5-for-5 on 4th downs on critical plays in those games. When the Panthers needed 1 yard against the Packers on their own 41 early in the game, Canales went to Young. - not Rico. When they needed 4 yards to keep the drive going at the 2 minute mark against the Cowboys he went to Young. Those throws weren’t empty-yardage completions; they were high-pressure, must-convert moments that directly contributed to all three wins. I keep reading how the Panthers  are winning in spite of Young, that Canales doesn’t trust him and schemes around him. But these drives show the opposite: when the game is on the line, Canales has consistently put the ball in Young’s hands and Young has consistently produced in those moments.  Some people do well in normal situations but crumble under pressure. Others can be uneven in normal times but produce when the presure is greatest. The question is who would you rather have in the playoffs. More importantly, who do you think Canales and the FO would want?  
    • I think is worse news for Tremayne. They need special teams help with him questionable.  If T-Mac is down, XL, Coker, Horn, and Renfrow. No way Chisena gets meaningful snaps as WR, only on special teams. 
×
×
  • Create New...