Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What's the worst movie you ever sat through?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

(question inspired by TNPanther's "Fifty Shades of Grey" thread)

 

So what's the absolute worst piece of cinematic dreck you've ever managed to sit through all the way to the bitter end?

 

Flipside Question: Have you ever seen something so incredibly bad you couldn't even finish watching it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahhh man, there were so many. Let's see:

Robocop 3

Twilight

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button

Sabotage

Batman & Robin

Terminator 3

The Breakfast Club

Green Lantern

Dumb & Dumber

Gigi

Majority of Nicolas Cage's films

Never Back Down

The Expendables 2

Any recent Adam Sandler movie

Etc

Etc

Etc

Etc

 

Ya stop in the middle of any of those?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Johnny Depp Lone Ranger movie.

Now if you'd asked about movies I hope I never have to watch again, I have a list of them.

That's an interesting sub-category.

There are movies I genuinely liked, but given the opportunity to watch them again, I'd pass.

"In the Bedroom" falls into that category. It's a film about two parents killing their late daughter's husband because they believe he killed her. Very well made movie, but left me feeling like I'd just taken part in doing something awful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dark Skies was abysmal. And I honestly couldn't sit through Lincoln. Daniel Day Lewis may be an inspiration to the acting world but in mine he is a cure for insomnia.

Vampire Hunter was a much better Lincoln movie. Whoever decided having a fight scene with stampeding horses is a genius. Also it has Mary Elizabeth Winstead from Rocky Mount.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thielen was a "dawg" like Dan Morgan likes to say. And they replaced him with puppies.  The analytics are probably saying this is more targets for younger receivers they are hoping to develop, specifically the first round pick from 2025. The eye test is going to show a very inexperienced group of WRs that are going to have some serious growing pains, for a 3rd year QB who has not yet proven to be the guy going forward.  It's crazy how in the literal first game of his NFL career, Cam Newton showed everyone he was a star QB and there was never any doubt about that. It almost didn't even matter who was around him, although he definitely had a serious lack of talent at WR for most of his career. Bryce is going into his third season and there is still a ton of doubt, and who is around him is seen as crucial for him to have success. I don't like it. 
    • Everyone says AT was old and slow but the one thing he could do consistently was get separation. That takes skill and it's been a huge issue in our WR for years. And while Moore may be a great locker room guy and our WR coach may be a 12 year vet, he's not playing in the game. Vets like AT do what they do because they can see things others don't and exploit it. The DB interview I mentioned before was with Stephon Gilmore after his DPOY season. He was pulling the younger DBs aside showing them things you wouldn't even think you'd be able to tell from the way the receiver was standing.  Seeing what a DB or LB is biting on in game that can give you that half step advantage is huge and we don't have that experience in our WR group right now and I think it could end up hurting us. None of our receivers have lined up against NFL corners successfully on a regular basis. Having someone that can walk over and give you a tip to get a half yard separation can be a difference maker. 
×
×
  • Create New...