Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What's the worst movie you ever sat through?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Zardoz. You guys havnt a clue.

This is 25x worse than the next movie on my list. For records I'm been on terrible movie kick for the last 5 years.

aayiieeeee.jpg

Yes it has sean connery in it. Without spoiling it, but giving a example...... the beginning scenes has building size stone-head thats floating in clouds, it lands and starts vomiting guns........ I repeat a giant floating stone head lands and starts to vomit large mount of rifles, machine guns, and pistols form its mouth while talking. That is all.

Wizard of Oz......come on, some of us have a clue....Clue was bad, the only thing good about that movie was Colleen Camp in a maid uniform and Lesley Ann Warren.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a shame, but these straight to dvd "movies" that actors like Nicolas Cage, Robert DeNiro, Bruce Willis, and John Cusack are putting out these days just to turn a quick profit will make some of the films mentioned in here look like modern classics.

 

If you want to see the worst movie you've ever sat through, hit up Netflix or Redbox. You won't have to look far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Movies like these always make me think about the process.

First off, somebody wrote it.

Somebody read it and thought "This would make a great movie."

Someone else heard about the idea and liked it enough to pay for it.

Actors, in some cases credible actors, read the scripts, agreed to play the roles, and acted it out (coached by a director).

Basically, loads of people (and money) involved in bringing the whole thing to screen.

You'd think somewhere along the way at least one person would stop and say to themselves "Holy crap, this thing is a steaming pile of dog s--t!" :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched some clips of it on YouTube a while back and couldn't believe how bad it was. I never actually saw the movie but I remembered the annoying commercials and how I keep seeing it on 'worst movies' lists and curiosity got the better of me.

Has Dana Carvey been seen since?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any of the resident evil movies.

Mortal Kombat annihlation

Super mario bros live action movie

Power rangers turbo

Teenage Mutant Ninja turtles 3

Punch-drunk love (actually any newer adam sandler movie, after little nickie his moves have sucked)

Matrix sequels (first was good,  but man did the sequels not live up to the hype)

Spiderman 3

 

tdlr i watch too many game or comic book based movies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any of the resident evil movies.

Mortal Kombat annihlation

Super mario bros live action movie

Power rangers turbo

Teenage Mutant Ninja turtles 3

Punch-drunk love (actually any newer adam sandler movie, after little nickie his moves have sucked)

Matrix sequels (first was good, but man did the sequels not live up to the hype)

Spiderman 3

tdlr i watch too many game or comic book based movies.

Power Rangers Turbo is next level man. I don't know what you're talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thielen was a "dawg" like Dan Morgan likes to say. And they replaced him with puppies.  The analytics are probably saying this is more targets for younger receivers they are hoping to develop, specifically the first round pick from 2025. The eye test is going to show a very inexperienced group of WRs that are going to have some serious growing pains, for a 3rd year QB who has not yet proven to be the guy going forward.  It's crazy how in the literal first game of his NFL career, Cam Newton showed everyone he was a star QB and there was never any doubt about that. It almost didn't even matter who was around him, although he definitely had a serious lack of talent at WR for most of his career. Bryce is going into his third season and there is still a ton of doubt, and who is around him is seen as crucial for him to have success. I don't like it. 
    • Everyone says AT was old and slow but the one thing he could do consistently was get separation. That takes skill and it's been a huge issue in our WR for years. And while Moore may be a great locker room guy and our WR coach may be a 12 year vet, he's not playing in the game. Vets like AT do what they do because they can see things others don't and exploit it. The DB interview I mentioned before was with Stephon Gilmore after his DPOY season. He was pulling the younger DBs aside showing them things you wouldn't even think you'd be able to tell from the way the receiver was standing.  Seeing what a DB or LB is biting on in game that can give you that half step advantage is huge and we don't have that experience in our WR group right now and I think it could end up hurting us. None of our receivers have lined up against NFL corners successfully on a regular basis. Having someone that can walk over and give you a tip to get a half yard separation can be a difference maker. 
×
×
  • Create New...