Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL: Greg Hardy won't be reinstated because he hasn't been disciplined yet


Montsta

Recommended Posts

Camon man thats way different

Is it though?

Both would be losing time they can never replace but are getting paid for it. Apparently that's all the huddle needs to not see it as a punishment. All igo needs is to get paid to not be around his wife and kids.

"Sounds like a paid vacation to me har har har"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NFL players have to consent and agree to be placed on it. They can resist if they want. Hardy believed that was his best option.

I'm just stating fact about the list

He likely agreed to it bc it secured him a paid vacation instead of facing you know.....punsihment of losing game day checks.

 

I'm pretty sure Peterson didn't consent to being put back on the Exempt list the other day after winning the suspension appeal.  So yea, we all read that Hardy chose the latter of the two punishments presented to him last year, but it doesn't seem accurate that a player HAS to consent to being put on it.  Since I'm pretty sure Peterson didn't agree to being put back on it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're a parent right?

You don't get to see your wife and kids grow up for an entire year. An entire year of precious time with them is taken away from you.

During that time you'll get paid though.

Is that punishment?

If you say no you should show that to your wife and kids.

 

What the holy hell are you talking about?

 

You are actually comparing Hardy being paid to sit out and get paid $13M (while traveling, working on his rap album, etc) to someone who is not able to see their wife and kids for a year?  Talk about playing WAY out in left field....you are not even in the stadium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NFL players have to consent and agree to be placed on it. They can resist if they want. Hardy believed that was his best option.

I'm just stating fact about the list

Are you really this fuging slow? Peterson JUST GOT PUT ON THE EXEMPT LIST YESTERDAY, while the NFL appeals the judge's ruling. He did not fuging agree to being placed on it. Wow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure Peterson didn't consent to being put back on the Exempt list the other day after winning the suspension appeal. So yea, we all read that Hardy chose the latter of the two punishments presented to him last year, but it doesn't seem accurate that a player HAS to consent to being put on it. Since I'm pretty sure Peterson didn't agree to being put back on it.

The whole thing of them "choosing" to be put on that list is so the NFL has their ass covered legally when they impose a suspension with pay on these players.

It's purely to cover their ass not because the player has any actual choice. It's all what they can legally get away with.

NFL has clearly been making it up as they go along and luckily for them you have a majority of fans willing to carry their water for them and be complicit in ignorance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure Peterson didn't consent to being put back on the Exempt list the other day after winning the suspension appeal. So yea, we all read that Hardy chose the latter of the two punishments presented to him last year, but it doesn't seem accurate that a player HAS to consent to being put on it. Since I'm pretty sure Peterson didn't agree to being put back on it.

If he wasn't on the list what would his current status be?

There are lots of quirky rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL, I assume that by "reinstatement" he means "off the commissioner's exempt list". 

 

This is what happens when you let public opinion dictate policy, the NFL has painted themselves into a corner. 

 

Do ya think maybe if they had just come out and said "Yes, we screwed up big time by punishing too lightly in the past and from here on out we'll do better", and then just moved on rather than trying to face save with Rice, Hardy, Peterson, etc. that this stuff might not be the hot topic it is right now?

 

Can't help but feel that the way they've handled a lot of this has actually made their problems worse than they might have been?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have no proof. If the NFL finds proof then I think it's fair he gets a suspension.

The DA announced when the case was dropped they had reliable info a settlement was reached. If they were opperating under that understanding the its pretty safe to say that it happened. Have you been following this outside of this thread?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His current status would be active.

edit: as the overturning of his suspension intended.

But it was all wierd. Court didn't demand immediate something. NFL appealed.

I know the list allows certain communication that Peterson and his agent need to have that they couldn't if the appeal places AP in a suspensed status

I just haven't read anyone credible report otherwise in regards to consent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But it was all wierd. Court didn't demand immediate something. NFL appealed.

I know the list allows certain communication that Peterson and his agent need to be....

I just haven't read anyone credible report otherwise in regards to consent.

 

The entire concept of the exempt list is weird.  As it stands now, it's an abuse of power in my opinion.  The NFL, and this commissioner in particular, is woefully lacking in a system of checks and balances.  I know all the owners care about are the paychecks and account balances and they're the ones that give him his power, but the whole thing reeks of bullshit.  The exempt list is just another way for the commissioner to throw his weight around and move the chess pieces on his board rather than treat people fairly and work out honest solutions to problems.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With Freddie Slavin and Svech both playing at MVP levels, no one can touch us. Burns playing well.  Imagine if Jarvy and Aho get going…
    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
×
×
  • Create New...