Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How much trust do you have in Gettleman/Rivera in Offensive Tackle evaluation?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Just curious. 

 

Obviously last year's starting tackles were very bad. Foucault was even worse. 

 

They did manage to find a decent player in Remmers, but he only saw playing time due to injury. 

 

 

So... moving forward to 2015... how much trust do you have in their ability to evaluate tackles? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Oline talent is what Rivera knows the least about.  He's shown time and time again that he doesn't know to place the best players out there.

 

We seemed to have no choice in playing Bell, but goddamn, Chandler, Silatolu, and Kugbila are all linked to him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think last year was a result of dealing with the Hurney cap situation and the OTs were more a product of the cap than Gettleman and Rivera truly believing they were the solution. So the jury is still out in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think last year was a result of dealing with the Hurney cap situation and the OTs were more a product of the cap than Gettleman and Rivera truly believing they were the solution. So the jury is still out in my opinion.

 

^^^ this

 

if we can't re-sign our own guys, how can we bring in decent L/R Tackles? Plus in the draft, the L/R Tackles went early.

 

btw where did some of those top tackle draft picks end up playing? at guard, so yeah I trust Gettleman's Tackle evals

 

We had a quart worth of roster holes, and only a pint worth of available solutions. Pint can't hold a quart, but the pint does the best it can

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...