Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gandhi was kind of a dick


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

http://www.thecrimson.com/article/1983/3/7/the-truth-about-gandhi-pbtbhe-movie/

"When Gandhi's wife was stricken with pneumonia, British doctors told her husband that a shot of penicillin would heal her; nevertheless, Gandhi refused to have alien medicine injected into her body, and she died. Soon after, Gandhi caught malaria and, relenting from the standard applied to his wife, allowed doctors to save his life with quinine. He also allowed British doctors to perform an appendectomy on him, an alien operation if ever there was one. "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it weren't for religion and superstition holding back medicine, I truly believe we would have cured cancer (among many other things) by now. It's such a shame.

People should be able to do what they want with their bodies of corse, but not for others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it weren't for religion and superstition holding back medicine, I truly believe we would have cured cancer (among many other things) by now. It's such a shame.

People should be able to do what they want with their bodies of corse, but not for others.

 

politics and greed is what's holding back technological, medical, etc. advancement these days.  Just look at how long ago internal combustion was invented...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

politics and greed is what's holding back technological, medical, etc. advancement these days. Just look at how long ago internal combustion was invented...

Henry ford built a car out of plastic soybean composite in 1941 that was 1000 pounds lighter than step cars and arguably much safer.

I'm sure the steel guys of the day were happy about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Per Adam Schefter: https://x.com/AdamSchefter/status/1920523706624823739 Expected, but just want to rub it in here.
    • I try to keep up and project the roster with color-coded charts.  You can see priorities and gauge who has the best chance of making the roster--you can see the priorities as well.  Here, Yellow is a 2025 draft pick, green is an undrafted free agent, and orange is a free agent. The depth chart will obviously change and I am not sure about roles (positions in all cases), so that is not the real issue at this time, but yellows and oranges show how the team focused on which aspects of the defense:     In the front 5, there were 3 draft picks, 3 free agents (not including players we re-signed), and two undrafted players signed. In the back 6, there was 1 draft pick and 2 free agents (LB, S), and four undrafted free agents. The undrafted free agents are always long shots, but by identifying them, you can tell which longshots might make the roster.
    • The rise of analytics in sports goes back to the use of sabermetrics in baseball.  The ironic thing is that the whole point of Bill James work was to objectively figure out each players contribution to to a team's wins throughout the season.  This is possible in baseball because each at bat is essentially a 1v1 with an objective outcome.  Applying statistical averages also works a lot better with hundreds of plate appearances over 162 games a year. PFF grades plays subjectively, and then puts them into buckets.  They then create different statistics based on those buckets.  That's all well and good and I'm not saying it's useless.  But calling it analytics like it's some kind of objective science is a far cry from what is actually going on.
×
×
  • Create New...