Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hawks sign Lynch


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Too much. How much guaranteed? If they can cut him after this year then smart move

 

From the link...

 

 

Lynch gets $12 million this year, in the form $7.5 million signing bonus and a $4.5 million fully-guaranteed base salary.

In 2016, Lynch (if he plays) will get a base salary of $9 million.  In 2017 (if he plays), it’s a base salary of $7 million in 2017 along with a $3 million roster bonus due on the fifth day of the 2017 league year.

If Lynch retires after 2015, he’d be responsible in theory for paying back $5 million of the signing bonus.  But the Seahawks wouldn’t be required to pursue the money.  If they know going in that he may walk after 2015 (and that probably was one of the subjects discussed at Friday’s sit-down regarding the contract), it would be a surprise if they seek repayment of the money.

 

 

I suspect people are already theorizing that this is an 'apology' for the Super Bowl gaffe.

 

(no idea if there's any truth to that)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...to a three year deal for 31 million dollars (link)

 

Lynch is arguably the best RB in the league, but would you pay that much for a runningback these days?

 

It's too much but he's a beast and overpaying a little to keep him is understandable.  The unknown is him being the wrong side of 30 for 2 of those 3 years.  He has a lot of miles on his tread already. 

 

I truly believe if we have Kraken and Star we beat them in January.  We've been within a gnats hiney of beating them for over 3 years with a roster and circumstances far short of the masterpiece GMan is sculpting.  I can't wait to break the door down with a vengeance.  Bring on an aging beast mode. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol god they're gonna be in cap hell for a long long time. Still have to lock up Wilson and Wagner. This with Sherman and Thomas's contracts. hahaha oh lord I'm gonna love it when they can't afford poo and have to go through what we did.

Didn't they already extend Thomas and sherman last summer for four more years?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

...to a three year deal for 31 million dollars (link)

Lynch is arguably the best RB in the league, but would you pay that much for a runningback these days?

I think it's worth it for them. He's the main reason they have had a chance at a ring the past two years. They wouldn't have that shot going forward without him IMO.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think that depends more on how high our pick is. If we have the 1st, 2nd or even 3rd pick i think we are drafting a QB rather than shopping FA market for a QB1. Curious if we’d be reluctant to start a rookie QB week 1 though. 
    • Hurney 2.0 and Fitts were so bad I don't know if it was intentional or they were that abysmally clueless. Fittershits panicked repeatedly being on the back end of positional runs while Hurney couldn't evaluate anyone outside of the 1st.  I can't figure out why Plummer still has a jersey. There's no reason. Dalton brings nothing to the table. If another QB gets cut that has given a glimmer of anything better than what we have, we should look, and that goes for every position.  I cant get over how much different this team could have been with a competent GM and having accepted the Rams offer for Burns. This franchise could have gone in a totally different direction. 
    • I thought tanking wasn't actually a thing and we were firmly against it though?
×
×
  • Create New...