Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Compensatory picks and the long game


Moorgan

Recommended Posts

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/03/14/ravens-play-the-long-game-with-compensatory-picks/

Saw this on Twitter and thought about how one of the leagues best run organizations, the Ravens, are showing us the results of the seemingly same path we are headed down.

We aren't used to this approach and the angst on the board shows us the growing pains associated with transition and the long game.

Nobody really knows how compensatory picks works but it seems like we are getting in the business and look to improve using all the facets the system allows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Ozzie, but giving Flacco the contract he got was one of the more asinine moves I've seen

I agree that contract was a bit much but the organization is inarguably well run. And we seem to be mirroring them as an organization and Seattle as a roster.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL at the bickering.  

 

I keep telling people that team building is not a static proposition. It's fluid.  Much like coaching, you must be able to adapt---especially on the fly---if you want the best odds at winning.  I think that the ability to adapt is so underrated.  I just am waiting to see if G-man realizes this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct me if I'm wrong but if the offseason signing period ended today we would not get any compensatory picks in the 2016 draft. We have signed two UFA's(Ginn and that CB from Jax) and zero of our UFA's have currently signed elsewhere. Deangelo doesn't count since he was cut. The rule states that to get any picks you have to lose more UFAs than you sign. So even if Hardy gets a fat contract out west the numbers don't work out in our favor. Bell, Williams, Docket or some others will have to get a contract elsewhere to guarantee us a comp. pick next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
    • Nah we just talking about giving a platform and normalizing predators (who both beat women) opinions and celebrating it if it fits your narrative.  If that's fun I'm fine being a miserable fug by not supporting P.O.S like that. N b4 you call me a libtard or some other dumb ish know I'm an Anarchist/Libertarian and believe both these dudes should get a complete ass whooping (at min) or something worse for what they have done to women in this world. 
×
×
  • Create New...