Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A girl with...history

Lumps

By Lumps,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Lumps Newbie

Lumps

Posted
Posted

Ok so I met this girl, I've been with a lot of girls and I always thought the girl

I'd settle down with was less experienced. This girl has been with a lot of guys though but the problem is our compatibility, we're crazy for one another, totally get along and feel so comfortable around one another it's creepy. Spending the day looking at one another wondering what could be is fun, but the negative is the downfall will be so much harder.

At the same time I have another girl I'm seeing, doesn't have the body of the first girl or the attractiveness going on but in the intellectual department she is unmatched we connect intellectual so well just spending the day talking is so much fun.

Then there's that third girl who intellectually isn't there and attraction isn't quite there either but sexually it's like one person exists. Our sex is the best ever, it will never get better. When you're away all you do is crave the sex but you know there is not intellectual or physical attraction and the relationship is doomed for failure regardless of sex.

Which do you chose and why? Attraction as a feeling of potential, intellectual compatibility that will never end, or as straight up sex and physical compatibility?

Keep in mind you chose one and you lose the others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lumps Newbie

Lumps

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Which one has the most money? I'd pick that girl.

Now this is something that definitely doesn't matter to me but the sex girl has the best future, attractive and experienced girl is next but he intellectual is educated...and she is Asian, might make a difference to you haha.

Keep around the first one until you meet someone else or say fug it and settle because you're not getting any younger.

The first one, huh? Interesting take because the first one is the newest of the bunch...sex is still in the primitive stages and the future is exciting yet unknown and attractiveness is there but man she has just been with so many guys hard to trust anything at this point. Do you guys care about a girls' experience? I usually don't even touch a girl who goes beyond my 'reasonable' number. I mean are standards even allowed now days?

Why must you settle on one of those three? Keep searching for she who is attractive, is good in bed, and with whom you connect intellectually.

Otherwise, the deficiencies will drive you bananas.

I'm already going crazy trying to figure this out. Believe me, part of me is just wanting to say fug it and leave them all. But at the same time does such thing exist? Attractive and exited about a future, intellectual compatibility and great sex? It seems too good to be true. I've been with a lot of girls and my routine is becoming very old...I've never come across all three, seems impossible.

How are you having great sex without being physically attracted to the girl? I mean, I've bedded some ugly girls but usually not more than one drunken time and I find a high level of mutual attraction to be essential to great sex.

I know, right? Believe it or not sex isn't just about physical attraction....it's about mental being there....knowing exactly what to do with your partner and always doing it at the exact right moment. It's like the difference between a hot ass girl giving you crappy head vs. an average girl you feel you've known since childhood giving you one head like the world ends tomorrow. It's sexual compatibility not to be confused with physical attractiveness.

I can't even have sex with one girl.

On a serious note , go for the girl that will make you happy. Look for someone for the future.

And there is the problem, I just don't know...can't date all three, been down that path before and poo gets crazy...at some point I'll have to chose.

0cffce2068c5597f1566ac2174ddb419d7565f3c

Are you mad because I'm banging three chicks and have a dilemma? I'd bet irony says I wish I were you and you wish were me :/.

Looks fade. Sex always fades. If you genuinely get along with someone and connect then that will last a lot longer than the other two IMO.

Good, sound advice. It's hard when you're in the 'now' though, giving up either great sex or someone you're attracted to and have potential for someone who gives you only mind orgasms. But I am leaning towards what you're staying. I feel as though great sex will end if I chose this route though, and while that may fade in time...not yet!

Make a Stepford blended of the three.

Haha, I wish.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted

Can't quote you because you quoted so many people but I think you listed the first girl first because you like her best, just my hunch.  That's what I'd do if I was ranking women I was seeing, list the one I liked best first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      NBC Sports 2026 NFL GM rankings

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      He's handing off play calling duties to fuging Brad Idzik as well so, either that mouth breather can run the playbook and Canales can grow as an all around head coach or it will be a horrible decision and both of them and BY can screw off. I'm fine with that as long as it isn't just another excuse for BY to get another year with another coach worthy of working around his limitations as a qb. 
    • Paa Langfart
      Canes vs Canadians Gm 2 Rd 3 7pm

      By Paa Langfart · Posted

      Not only for Andersen but the whole team, having not beat the Habs this season before tonite.  Shows them that they aren't jinxed.
    • frankw
      Mean girls

      By frankw · Posted

      I understand why people say things like it could be worse in relation to Tepper but it just doesn't jive for me. Are the optics bad? Yes. Would I want her to be the owner of my team? No. But I mean she's only been owner for a year and the Colts overall are a better run organization. As far as I know they've also never had the distinction of having the worst win percentage in all of professional sports either. Tepper has owned this team for 8 years and about the only thing that has been consistent has been the ability to continue to find different ways to achieve new lows. Even now people are saying things are different yada yada but we said these same things at certain points under Rhule Fitterer and Reich. I'm going to wait to see how the rubber meets the road this upcoming season before I make any strong conclusions about anything in relation to the longevity under this franchise going forward.
×
×
  • Create New...