Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cosell on top WRs in draft via MMQB


top dawg

Recommended Posts

I was looking through Greg Cosell's twitter page and found this podcast:

http://mmqb.si.com/2015/03/24/the-mmqb-podcast-with-andy-benoit-nfl-draft-wide-receivers/

Cosell starts around 31:45 (I believe, or was it 30, anyway...) This podcast was before Perriman's workout, but he does give his analysis on Perriman, Cooper, White, Parker, Strong, DGB, Coates, and gives a little on Dorsett and Josh Harper.

You take it how you want, but know that all Cosell does is watch film. In my mind, as well as many others', he may be the most knowledgeable evaluator of them all. Just keep in mind that no one has a crystal ball when it comes to this stuff, but he is excellent regarding talent and traits. There are also some other podcasts where he breaks down different positions.

BTW, the hosts were talking around 27 or 28 about Kuecly and something to do with Gatorade, but I didn't have time to listen.

Nice questions and a nice break down! If you have 25 minutes, then listen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Summary on some guys:

 

He views Strong as a better mover than Parker, and can work well in the NFL against linebackers and safeties on the inside.  He thinks Parker is more of a compliment type of receiver.  Compared him to Davante Adams and Crabtree. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Summary on some guys:

He views Strong as a better mover than Parker, and can work well in the NFL against linebackers and safeties on the inside. He thinks Parker is more of a compliment type of receiver. Compared him to Davante Adams and Crabtree.

I don't believe that he compared him to Adams in that sense, I believe that he means that Parker is not primary receiver material like Adams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...