Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let's say These Are the Positions We Draft....Who fills the spots?


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

**DISCLAIMER** I am a very casual college football fan, so my familiarity with recruits, schools, stats etc. is limited until I do any research based off visits and linked team interest. With that being said, here's how I'd like our picks to shake out in this years draft, but why don't ya'll fill in the ???'s with your prospect expertise. Figured this would be a fun way to pass a slow Thursday in the office before a three day weekend!

 

1-WR:??? I think with Gettleman coming from a team that took Wr's early in NY and did not draft any first round OL if memory serves, will look to solidify the #2 WR spot to balance out the field as far as coverage is concerned in regards to rolled coverage to KB, and Olsen at times. He's on record stating he sees Oher as a starter and I believe him, so no need to draft a tackle in the ''first''.

 

2-OT:??? As we solidify receiver depth in the first it's time to look at the future at tackle, I'd imagine we draft a player here with experience at both spots L/R for depth, and to become an eventual starter in the coming years, as well as spot duty in the event of an injury.

 

3-DB:??? I like the full rotation at DT/DL returning from last season, Ealy was a blue chipper in the 2nd last year, and insurance for Hardy leaving via FA I think his growth allows us to address the secondary & add more talent. Allowing Bene' to move inside in nickel situations.

 

4-HB:??? I don't see us taking a first round HB given Gettleman's frugality and the de-valuation of 1st round running backs. However it is not a position the team can afford to ignore and a mid round selection seems like the perfect time to look for a compliment to our current stable.

 

5-DB/OL/S:??? Here I see us adding depth to the OL and some additional speed to our secondary, I think our starters are in place for the OL, but the secondary behind Norman, Bene', Boston, and Harper is lacking talent to be developed. What better time to address the depth in the secondary than by double dipping in the 5th?

 

6-WR:??? The future of our receiving corp behind Benjamin, and our 1st round pick still leaves a lot to be desired, Cotchery, and Bersin are slow possession receivers, Ginn is 29 with a two year deal, meanwhile Brown is even smaller and has shown a propensity to get nicked up, meanwhile what Hill brings is still an unknown to us. Perfect time to draft a developmental receiver.

 

7-LB:??? Probably the strongest personnel grouping on our roster led by Kuechly and Davis, I think we could see a raw athletic LB find his name called with hopes of an early special teams role in the future. Klein, Trusnik, and Glanton buy us some time before we really need to bring in a blue chip prospect to eventually replace Davis next to Kuechly.

 

Have at it gents!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1st (WR) - Breshad Perriman, Central Florida or Jaelen Strong, Arizona State.  (the only way we take a WR is if one of the top guys falls to us)

2nd (OT) - Jake Fisher, Oregon or one of the Oklahoma twins (Thompson or Williams)

3rd (DB) - Alex Carter, Stanford (not likely there) or Byron Jones, Connecticut

4th (HB) - Javoris Allen, USC

5th (DB) - Jacoby Glenn, Central Florida

5th (OL) - Andy Gallik ©, Boston College

5th (S) - Justin Cox, Mississippi State

6th (WR) - Deontay Greenberry, Houston

7th (LB) - Zach Hodges, Harvard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're drafting by need instead of best player available. This is how the Falcons have drafted and look where that has gotten them.

 

No, the Falcons mortgaged several picks for one player, this is far from that. 

 

Look at all of Gettleman's drafts to date:

 

Star, KK, KB, Ealy (our 1st and 2nd's) in sequential drafts, the year we drafted two DT's was following a season where DT was a huge need for the team. Same for KB and Ealy, we had just cut the all-time leading everything at WR and had just failed to extend Hardy, insert high pick on a DE. 

 

Do not confuse BPA/Need matching up. Looking at our roster and draft this year and his draft history associated with NY, and most recently us BPA has also met need, I think we are positioned to follow suit again in the early rounds while matching BPA and need again. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Jaelen Strong
DJ Humphries
Doran Grant
Javourius Allen
Clayton Geathers
Titus Davis
Mark Nzeocha
 
Btw you forgot our 2 comp picks in the 5th

 

 

The 5th spot should have 3 positions, DB/OL/S that's includes our extra picks in that round. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're drafting by need instead of best player available. This is how the Falcons have drafted and look where that has gotten them.

 

There are plenty of teams who use need based drafting and do extremely well. BPA vs Need is like the 3-4 vs the 4-3 defenses. They are different styles that depend mostly on the execution to be successful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, the Falcons mortgaged several picks for one player, this is far from that. 

 

Look at all of Gettleman's drafts to date:

 

Star, KK, KB, Ealy (our 1st and 2nd's) in sequential drafts, the year we drafted two DT's was following a season where DT was a huge need for the team. Same for KB and Ealy, we had just cut the all-time leading everything at WR and had just failed to extend Hardy, insert high pick on a DE. 

 

Do not confuse BPA/Need matching up. Looking at our roster and draft this year and his draft history associated with NY, and most recently us BPA has also met need, I think we are positioned to follow suit again in the early rounds while matching BPA and need again. 

 

That Julio Jones trade was 4 years ago look more recently like last year. They needed front 7 players for their backasswards 3-4 hybrid they were trying out so they drafted 4 LBs last year hoping someone would stick. All 4 LBs did jack-poo and weren't an answer at either run-stopping or pass-rushing. Yes they had decent 1st-3rd round picks, and all those LBs were 4th round and later.

 

That's what drafting for need does. It may work well in the 1st and decently in the 2nd, but odds get much worse of finding a starter caliber player based on "well, we feel thin at safety, so let's get the highest rated safety left instead of grabbing that running back who may not have been the fastest but will be a starter in our system mid-season". Later round gems like we've had in Josh Norman, AJ Klein, Tre Boston, and Bene Benwikere aren't happening to Atlanta, New Orleans, and Tampa because they follow a needs philosophy like we used to before Gettleman,

 

TL;DR we're drafting better than the rest of the NFC South using BPA instead of need

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are plenty of teams who use need based drafting and do extremely well. BPA vs Need is like the 3-4 vs the 4-3 defenses. They are different styles that depend mostly on the execution to be successful.

 

If we want to consistently be in playoff and SB contention, we are best served by following teams that use BPA like the Ravens, Packers, and Seahawks than teams that draft for need. Filling needs is for free agency. Long-term roster strategy is better done drafting quality players even if they sit for a year or two because the starters are still serviceable.

 

Drafting for need by definition can't have a 3 year or 5 year long term plan. It's "what do we need this year" every year, and frankly I was tired of our past successes being 1 year and done. We ran hot and cold for the playoffs using a draft for need philosophy, and am happy with our new BPA  approach and the better future it is appearing to bring.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Jaelen Strong, Arizona State

2. Cedric Ogbuehi, Texas A&M

3. Steven Nelson, Oregon State

4. Mike Davis, South Carolina

5. Justin Coleman, Tennessee

5. Max Garcia, Florida

5. Jordan Richards, Stanford

6. Stefon Diggs, Maryland

7. Dyshawn Davis, Syracuse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...