Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So...How do you play it?


iamhubby1

Recommended Posts

Let's say Peanut comes to camp ready to take over that #2CB slot. Putting Norman at #1, and Bene' in the slot. That is 3 pretty darn good CBs. How do we play it?

Conventional wisdom would dictate putting Norman on the #1WR, and let Peanut take the #2. As Josh has shown the ability to do well against good competition, this seems to make a lot of sense. If Peanut can hold his own. And if Bene' shows any growth, this would seem to be an ideal situation.

Now, even as good as this sounds. Players get beat, mistakes happen, and big plays are the results. Which means, we would still most likely have to keep both Safeties back on most plays. On most plays, 2 high Safeties would be over-kill, cuz Norman and Peanut will do their jobs well. But just for insurance sake, keeping both Safeties back just makes sense.

But...let's flip the script. Let's put Norman on the #2, and Peanut on the #1. We give Peanut Safety help over the top, and let Norman blanket his guy. This allows one of our Safeties to roam. He can blitz occasionally. Or he can cheat in coverage on Bene' or Peanut. Point being, With only 1 Safety deep, you can get creative with your schemes.

Best case; Norman can shut down most #2 WRs. And Peanut, with Safety help, should limit what a #1 can do. Making the need for 2 deep Safeties rather superfluous.

I know it sounds backwards to flip Norman and Peanut. I was just thinking it would give us more flexibility.

tl/dr version. Read it anyway you lazy potlicker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just play sides like the Seachickens do. If Tillman can play to his capabilities we'll have 2 shutdown corners outside and Bene can lock down the slot. If Tillman plays like he did in 2012 and we draft Collins and Tre improves we could have a top 3-5 secondary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd have Norman always on the #1 and switch between Tillman and Bene depending on who the #2 is.

 

Tillman matches up better with taller, older, and slower #2 WRs like Vincent Jackson, Marques Colston, Roddy White, and Andre Johnson.

 

Bene would cover the faster, younger, and shorter #2 WRs like Randall Cobb, Victor Cruz, DeSean Jackson, and T.Y. Hilton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just play sides like the Seachickens do. If Tillman can play to his capabilities we'll have 2 shutdown corners outside and Bene can lock down the slot. If Tillman plays like he did in 2012 and we draft Collins and Tre improves we could have a top 3-5 secondary.

I really don't like that strategy because it lets the other team dictate the matchups.

Fox stubbornly stuck to that against Arizona back in 2008.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd have Norman always on the #1 and switch between Tillman and Bene depending on who the #2 is.

Tillman matches up better with taller, older, and slower #2 WRs like Vincent Jackson, Marques Colston, Roddy White, and Andre Johnson.

Bene would cover the faster, younger, and shorter #2 WRs like Randall Cobb, Victor Cruz, DeSean Jackson, and T.Y. Hilton.

That could work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd have Norman always on the #1 and switch between Tillman and Bene depending on who the #2 is.

 

Tillman matches up better with taller, older, and slower #2 WRs like Vincent Jackson, Marques Colston, Roddy White, and Andre Johnson.

 

Bene would cover the faster, younger, and shorter #2 WRs like Randall Cobb, Victor Cruz, DeSean Jackson, and T.Y. Hilton.

I understand what you are saying. And for the most part, this would seem to be the way to go. However, playing that scheme would mean both Safeties staying back. Because you have to protect against the big plays.

My only reason for wanting to switch Peanut and Norman would be for scheme flexibility. For the ability to get our Safeties moving. After all, in today's NFL confusing QBs is not an easy task. If we have the chance to mix things up. Why not?

If you trust Norman on the #2, and Bene' on the slot, you may be able to get by with only 1 safety deep. Giving us flexibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I saw an interesting point the other day about our type of situation.  It could have been wise to hold him off for 1-2 weeks, but that would not have anything to do with Bryce and you could easily communicate that from a PR standpoint.   Why? Well, we just brought an entirely new staff into town, new offense for the returning OL, and had wholesale turnover elsewhere.  So just run Dalton out there the first game or so to see how things are shaking out.  Dry run to make sure we won't kill the kid.  We weren't eyeing the SB.  Get a sense of the line, the receivers, the playbook.  It gives you a glimpse of what Bryce would be stepping into and a good barometer on where things stood sans him.  I suppose we sort of did that with Dalton, but that was a reactive switch and like @Ricky Spanish mentioned, it was against an injured SEA defense where we threw a ridiculous amount.  Who knows, maybe we could have at least won a game or two more that way.  You can adjustments prior to Bryce stepping in, better tee it up for him, and maybe we end up winning game 1 or 2. Last year was such a sh*tshow.  One of the worst seasons I've ever experienced in any sport for any team.  Absolutely nothing made sense together.  Happy we cut the cord early, but should have never hired that crew in the first place.   
    • Johnson is gonna want $20M+ next year. That's why they should have drafted Ladd.
    • It's like folk didn't even watch the game. Dalton took a beating, and barely avoided a lot more violent hits. No 35 years old QB is going to survive a season like that. Imagine him against Dallas or Houston or Indy or Detroit or New Orleans twice! He played better than Bryce in that 1 game, but he wouldn't have lasted half the season. 
×
×
  • Create New...